Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle, Halle, Germany.
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Dec;41(10):e1297-e1303. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002884.
The primary aim of the study was to explore whether reduced spread of electrical field is observed after partial or subtotal cochleoectomy and cochlear implantation compared with standard cochlear implantation. Secondarily, the influence on speech perception was explored comparing both groups.
Nonconcurrent cohort study.
Monocentric study at a tertiary referral center.
Twenty adult cochlear implant (CI) users after tumor resection with cochleoectomy of varying extent and 20 electrode-matched CI users with standard electrode insertion.
Partial and subtotal cochleoectomy for tumor removal and CI.
Trans-impedance, electrically evoked compound action potentials, and word recognition were measured. Relative impedance was computed as a function of distance between the stimulation and recording electrode.
Trans-impedance was smaller and more homogeneous in patients with partial or subtotal cochleoectomy than in the control group. In the tumor group, the mean relative impedance decreased to 0.20 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.03) at a distance of 1 electrode and to 0.25 (SD = 0.04) in the control group. After excluding seven patients with a second tumor in the internal auditory canal or cerebellopontine angle, with transmodiolar tumors, after near total cochleoectomy, or only extended cochleostomy, word recognition was 61% (SD = 19%) at 3 months and 75% (SD = 19%) at 12 months after activation of the audio processor in the tumor group. At 12 months, it was significantly (p < 0.05) better than in the control group (3 mo: 45%, SD = 25%; 12 mo: 53%, SD = 26%). A smaller trans-impedance is associated with a better word recognition.
We conclude that the surgical technique used for CI surgery after subtotal cochleoectomy reduces the spread of the electric field and overcomes the potential drawbacks in structure preservation associated with that technique.
本研究的主要目的是探讨与标准人工耳蜗植入相比,部分或次全耳蜗切除术和人工耳蜗植入后电场传播是否减少。其次,通过比较两组来探讨对言语感知的影响。
非同期队列研究。
在一家三级转诊中心进行的单中心研究。
20 名因肿瘤切除而接受不同程度耳蜗切除术和 20 名电极匹配的人工耳蜗植入患者。
肿瘤切除的部分和次全耳蜗切除术和人工耳蜗植入。
与对照组相比,部分或次全耳蜗切除术患者的跨阻抗更小且更均匀。在肿瘤组中,平均相对阻抗在距离刺激和记录电极 1 个电极时降低到 0.20(标准差[SD] = 0.03),在对照组中降低到 0.25(SD = 0.04)。在排除 7 名患者(内听道或桥小脑角的第二肿瘤、跨模肿瘤、近全耳蜗切除术或仅扩展耳蜗造口术)后,肿瘤组在激活音频处理器后的 3 个月时识别率为 61%(SD = 19%),12 个月时为 75%(SD = 19%)。在 12 个月时,明显优于对照组(3 个月:45%,SD = 25%;12 个月:53%,SD = 26%)。较小的跨阻抗与更好的言语识别相关。
我们得出结论,次全耳蜗切除术后用于人工耳蜗植入手术的手术技术减少了电场的传播,并克服了与该技术相关的结构保存的潜在缺点。