Suppr超能文献

为什么奥地利限制自我用药的机会?一项访谈研究及与其他国家的比较。

Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Austrian Federal Office for Safety in Health Care, BASG/Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, AGES, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 25;16(1):e0245504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245504. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Austria has high health resource use compared to similar countries. Reclassifying (switching) medicines from prescription to non-prescription can reduce pressure on health resources and aid timely access to medicines. Since Austria is less progressive in this area than many other countries, this research aimed to elucidate enablers and barriers to it reclassifying medicines and make recommendations for change in the context of similar research conducted elsewhere.

METHODS

Qualitative research using a heuristic approach was conducted in Austria in 2018. Informed by their own "insider" and "outsider" knowledge, the authors identified themes from personal interviews with 24 participants, including reclassification committee members, government officials and stakeholders, before comparing these themes with earlier research findings.

RESULTS

Significant barriers to reclassification included committee conservatism, minimal political support, medical negativity and few company applications. Insufficient transparency about committee decisions, expectations of adverse committee decisions and a limited market discouraged company applications. Austria's 'social partnership' arrangement and consensus decision making aided a conservative approach, but the regulator and an alternative non-committee switch process were enabling. Pharmacy showed mixed interest in reclassification. Suggested improvements include increasing transparency, committee composition changes, encouraging a more evidence-based approach by the committee, more pharmacy undergraduate clinical training, and companies using scientific advisory meetings and submitting high quality applications.

CONCLUSION

Removing barriers to reclassification would facilitate non-prescription availability of medicines and encourage self-care, and could reduce pressure on healthcare resources.

摘要

背景

与其他相似国家相比,奥地利的卫生资源使用量较高。将药品从处方药重新分类(转换)为非处方药可以减轻卫生资源的压力,并有助于及时获得药品。由于奥地利在这方面的进展不如许多其他国家,因此这项研究旨在阐明重新分类药品的促进因素和障碍,并根据在其他地方进行的类似研究提出变革建议。

方法

2018 年在奥地利进行了定性研究,采用启发式方法。作者根据自己的“内部”和“外部”知识,从 24 名参与者(包括重新分类委员会成员、政府官员和利益相关者)的个人访谈中确定主题,然后将这些主题与早期的研究结果进行比较。

结果

重新分类的重大障碍包括委员会的保守主义、政治支持不足、医学上的消极态度以及很少有公司申请。委员会决策的透明度不足、对委员会不利决策的期望以及有限的市场阻碍了公司的申请。奥地利的“社会伙伴关系”安排和共识决策有助于采取保守的方法,但监管机构和替代非委员会转换过程具有推动作用。药店对重新分类表现出混合兴趣。建议的改进措施包括提高透明度、改变委员会组成、鼓励委员会采取更基于证据的方法、增加药学本科临床培训、以及公司利用科学咨询会议和提交高质量的申请。

结论

消除重新分类的障碍将促进非处方药的供应,并鼓励自我保健,从而减轻医疗保健资源的压力。

相似文献

1
Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 25;16(1):e0245504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245504. eCollection 2021.
3
Why does increasing public access to medicines differ between countries? Qualitative comparison of nine countries.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Oct;20(4):231-9. doi: 10.1177/1355819615593302. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
4
Widening consumer access to medicines: a comparison of prescription to non-prescription medicine switch in Australia and New Zealand.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0119011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119011. eCollection 2015.
5
Medicines reclassification from a pharmaceutical industry perspective: An international qualitative study.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Apr;15(4):387-394. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
6
Australian pharmacy perspectives on increasing access to medicines through reclassification.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Apr;24(2):81-90. doi: 10.1177/1355819618799112. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
9
Pattern of medication selling and self-medication practices: A study from Punjab, Pakistan.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 22;13(3):e0194240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194240. eCollection 2018.
10
A new model of prescription to nonprescription reclassification: the calcipotriol case study.
Clin Ther. 2012 Jun;34(6):1324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.04.019. Epub 2012 May 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Australian pharmacists: ready for increased non-prescription medicines reclassification.
Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Jun;28(3):246-254. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12594. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Medicines reclassification from a pharmaceutical industry perspective: An international qualitative study.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Apr;15(4):387-394. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
4
Participants' expectations and experiences with periodic health examinations in Austria - a qualitative study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 30;18(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3640-6.
5
Australian pharmacy perspectives on increasing access to medicines through reclassification.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Apr;24(2):81-90. doi: 10.1177/1355819618799112. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
6
The Qualitative Descriptive Approach in International Comparative Studies: Using Online Qualitative Surveys.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Sep 1;7(9):778-781. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.142.
7
EU health systems classification: a new proposal from EURO-HEALTHY.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3323-3.
8
Changing direction: the struggle of regulating assisted reproductive technology in Austria.
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2017 Feb 22;3:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.12.005. eCollection 2016 Dec.
10
Quantifying low-value services by using routine data from Austrian primary care.
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Dec;26(6):912-916. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw080. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验