Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Cardiology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, and University of Oslo, N-0027 Oslo, Norway.
Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension & Nephrology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Dec 18;23(1):61-70. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa415.
The aim of this study is to investigate determinants of left atrial (LA) reservoir and pump strain and if these parameters may serve as non-invasive markers of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure.
In a multicentre study of 322 patients with cardiovascular disease of different aetiologies, LA strain and other echocardiographic parameters were compared with invasively measured LV filling pressure. The strongest determinants of LA reservoir and pump strain were LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (r-values 0.64 and 0.51, respectively) and LV filling pressure (r-values -0.52 and -0.57, respectively). Left atrial volume was another independent, but weaker determinant of both LA strains. For both LA strains, association with LV filling pressure was strongest in patients with reduced LV ejection fraction. Left atrial reservoir strain <18% and LA pump strain <8% predicted elevated LV filling pressure better (P < 0.05) than LA volume and conventional Doppler parameters. Accuracy to identify elevated LV filling pressure was 75% for LA reservoir strain alone and 72% for pump strain alone. When combined with conventional parameters, accuracy was 82% for both LA strains. In patients with normal LV systolic function by GLS, LA pump strain >14% identified normal LV filling pressure with 92% accuracy.
Left atrial reservoir and pump strain are determined predominantly by LV GLS and filling pressure. Accuracy of LA strains to identify elevated LV filling pressure was best in patients with reduced LV systolic function. High values of LA pump strain, however, identified normal LV filling pressure with good accuracy in patients with normal systolic function.
本研究旨在探讨左心房(LA)储备和泵功能应变的决定因素,以及这些参数是否可作为左心室(LV)充盈压的无创标志物。
在一项针对不同病因心血管疾病的 322 例患者的多中心研究中,比较了 LA 应变和其他超声心动图参数与LV 充盈压的测量结果。LA 储备和泵功能应变的最强决定因素是 LV 整体纵向应变(GLS)(r 值分别为 0.64 和 0.51)和 LV 充盈压(r 值分别为-0.52 和-0.57)。LA 容积也是两者的另一个独立但较弱的决定因素。对于两种 LA 应变,与 LV 充盈压的相关性在 LV 射血分数降低的患者中最强。LA 储备应变<18%和 LA 泵应变<8%预测 LV 充盈压升高的效果优于 LA 容积和传统多普勒参数(P<0.05)。LA 储备应变单独识别 LV 充盈压升高的准确性为 75%,LA 泵应变单独识别的准确性为 72%。当与传统参数相结合时,两种 LA 应变的准确性均为 82%。在通过 GLS 评估具有正常 LV 收缩功能的患者中,LA 泵应变>14%可识别出正常的 LV 充盈压,其准确性为 92%。
LA 储备和泵功能应变主要由 LV GLS 和充盈压决定。LA 应变识别 LV 充盈压升高的准确性在 LV 收缩功能降低的患者中最佳。然而,在具有正常收缩功能的患者中,LA 泵应变的高值可以很好地准确识别正常的 LV 充盈压。