• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对罕见遗传性神经发育障碍的 N-of-1 研究的系统评价:1 的力量。

Systematic Review of N-of-1 Studies in Rare Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders: The Power of 1.

机构信息

's Heeren Loo (A.R.M.), Amersfoort, the Netherlands, and Amsterdam UMC (A.R.M.), Pediatric Metabolic Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Pediatric Metabolic Diseases (M.M.G.B), Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.M.v.d.V.), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Evidence, Biostatistics (K.C.B.R.), Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics (M.C.C.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Pediatric Metabolic Diseases (C.D.M.v.K.), Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Department of Pediatrics (C.D.M.v.K.), Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Centre for Mitochondrial Medicine, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Pediatric Metabolic Diseases (F.A.W.), Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Library (J.G.D.), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 's Heeren Loo (E.B.), Amersfoort, the Netherlands, and Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology (E.B.), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, University Health Network (E.B.), The Dalglish Family 22q Clinic, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and 's Heeren Loo (A.M.v.E.), Amersfoort, the Netherlands, Amsterdam UMC (A.M.v.E.), Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Erasmus Medical Center (A.M.v.E.), ENCORE, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Neurology. 2021 Mar 16;96(11):529-540. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011597. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000011597
PMID:33504638
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8032375/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To improve the use of N-of-1 studies in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, we systematically reviewed the literature and formulated recommendations for future studies.

METHODS

The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020154720). EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched for relevant studies. Information was recorded on types of interventions, outcome measures, validity, strengths, and limitations using standard reporting guidelines and critical appraisal tools. Qualitative and descriptive analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the N-of-1 inclusion criteria, including both single trials and series. Interventions were mainly directed to neuropsychiatric manifestations. Main strengths were the use of personalized and clinically relevant outcomes in most studies. Generalizability was compromised due to limited use of validated and generalizable outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

N-of-1 studies are sporadically reported in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders. Properly executed N-of-1 studies may provide a powerful alternative to larger randomized controlled trials in rare disorders and a much needed bridge between practice and science. We provide recommendations for future N-of-1 studies in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, ultimately optimizing evidence-based and personalized care.

摘要

目的

为了提高在罕见遗传性神经发育障碍中使用 N-of-1 研究的水平,我们系统地回顾了文献并为未来的研究制定了建议。

方法

系统评价方案已在 PROSPERO 国际前瞻性注册系统评价(CRD42020154720)中进行了注册。在 EMBASE 和 MEDLINE 中搜索了相关研究。使用标准报告指南和关键评估工具记录了干预措施类型、结局测量、有效性、优势和局限性等信息。进行了定性和描述性分析。

结果

符合 N-of-1 纳入标准的研究有 12 项,包括单试验和系列研究。干预措施主要针对神经精神表现。由于很少使用经过验证和可推广的结局测量,因此大多数研究都使用了个性化和临床相关的结局,这是其主要优势。由于可推广性有限,因此普遍存在问题。

结论

在罕见遗传性神经发育障碍中,N-of-1 研究的报道很少。适当执行的 N-of-1 研究可为罕见疾病中的更大规模随机对照试验提供有力替代方法,也为实践和科学之间架起了一座急需的桥梁。我们为罕见遗传性神经发育障碍中的未来 N-of-1 研究提供了建议,最终优化了基于证据的个体化治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9502/8032375/0ef45704a7eb/NEUROLOGY2020132258FF4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9502/8032375/eb7af6f11f10/NEUROLOGY2020132258FF1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9502/8032375/9d057873adb3/NEUROLOGY2020132258FF2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9502/8032375/42b1da65e490/NEUROLOGY2020132258FF3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9502/8032375/0ef45704a7eb/NEUROLOGY2020132258FF4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9502/8032375/eb7af6f11f10/NEUROLOGY2020132258FF1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9502/8032375/9d057873adb3/NEUROLOGY2020132258FF2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9502/8032375/42b1da65e490/NEUROLOGY2020132258FF3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9502/8032375/0ef45704a7eb/NEUROLOGY2020132258FF4.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic Review of N-of-1 Studies in Rare Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders: The Power of 1.对罕见遗传性神经发育障碍的 N-of-1 研究的系统评价:1 的力量。
Neurology. 2021 Mar 16;96(11):529-540. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011597. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
The Effectiveness of Web-Based Interventions Delivered to Children and Young People With Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针对神经发育障碍儿童和青少年的基于网络干预措施的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 1;21(11):e13478. doi: 10.2196/13478.
6
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.在医疗保健干预随机试验的系统评价中,因对结果和分析进行选择性纳入及报告而产生的偏倚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.
7
Implementation of Telehealth Services to Assess, Monitor, and Treat Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Systematic Review.远程医疗服务在评估、监测和治疗神经发育障碍中的应用:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e22619. doi: 10.2196/22619.
8
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
9
Supported self-management for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an evidence synthesis and economic analysis.中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的支持性自我管理:证据综合与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(36):1-516. doi: 10.3310/hta19360.
10
Non-pharmacological interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) delivered in school settings: systematic reviews of quantitative and qualitative research.在学校环境中实施的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)非药物干预措施:定量和定性研究的系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jun;19(45):1-470. doi: 10.3310/hta19450.

引用本文的文献

1
Blueprint for clinical N-of-1 strategies with off-label precision treatments in monogenic epilepsies.单基因癫痫中应用超说明书精准治疗的临床单病例N-of-1策略蓝图。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jun 16;20(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03750-z.
2
Considerations for mRNA Product Development, Regulation and Deployment Across the Lifecycle.mRNA产品全生命周期开发、监管与应用的考量因素
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Apr 28;13(5):473. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050473.
3
A conceptual model and practical guidance for the development, administration, and evaluation of individualized therapies.

本文引用的文献

1
SPIRIT extension and elaboration for n-of-1 trials: SPENT 2019 checklist.针对单病例试验的SPIRIT扩展与细化:2019年SPENT清单
BMJ. 2020 Feb 27;368:m122. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m122.
2
Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability.验证 NIH 工具包认知电池在智力障碍中的应用。
Neurology. 2020 Mar 24;94(12):e1229-e1240. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009131. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
3
Practice-Based Research in Complementary Medicine: Could N-of-1 Trials Become the New Gold Standard?补充医学中基于实践的研究:单病例试验会成为新的金标准吗?
个性化治疗的开发、管理与评估的概念模型及实践指南。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 24;12:1493832. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1493832. eCollection 2025.
4
Amitriptyline use in individuals with KCNQ2/3 gain-of-function variants: A retrospective cohort study.阿米替林在携带KCNQ2/3功能获得性变异个体中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Epilepsia. 2025 May;66(5):1628-1640. doi: 10.1111/epi.18310. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
5
CTGCT, Centre of Excellence for the Technologies of Gene and Cell Therapy: Collaborative translation of scientific discoveries into advanced treatments for neurological rare genetic diseases and cancer.基因与细胞治疗技术卓越中心(CTGCT):将科学发现协同转化为针对神经罕见遗传病和癌症的先进治疗方法。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Dec 2;27:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.11.051. eCollection 2025.
6
Clinical Actionability of Genetic Findings in Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脑瘫基因检测结果的临床可操作性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Feb 1;179(2):137-44. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5059.
7
Navigating the outcome maze: a scoping review of outcomes and instruments in clinical trials in genetic neurodevelopmental disorders and intellectual disability.探索结果迷宫:对遗传神经发育障碍和智力残疾临床试验中的结果与工具的范围综述
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2024 Apr 25;5:26330040241245721. doi: 10.1177/26330040241245721. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
A methodological review of randomised n-of-1 trials.随机 n-of-1 试验的方法学综述。
Trials. 2024 Apr 16;25(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08100-1.
9
Challenges in developing therapies in fragile X syndrome: how the FXLEARN trial can guide research.脆性 X 综合征治疗研发面临的挑战:FXLEARN 试验如何指导研究
J Clin Invest. 2024 Mar 1;134(5):e175036. doi: 10.1172/JCI175036.
10
Evaluating Personalized (N-of-1) Trials in Rare Diseases: How Much Experimentation Is Enough?评估罕见病中的个性化(单病例)试验:多少实验才算足够?
Harv Data Sci Rev. 2022;2022(Spec Iss 3). doi: 10.1162/99608f92.e11adff0. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jan 8;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010015.
4
Goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure in rare disease trials: a conceptual proposal for validation.目标达成量表作为罕见病试验的结局指标:验证的概念性建议。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 4;19(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0866-x.
5
Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies.使用模拟研究比较汇总的单病例试验与平行和交叉随机对照试验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Nov 6;7(4):137. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040137.
6
Labeling of Disease-Modifying Therapies for Neurodegenerative Disorders.神经退行性疾病疾病修饰疗法的标签标注
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Oct 17;6:223. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00223. eCollection 2019.
7
The POWER-tool: Recommendations for involving patient representatives in choosing relevant outcome measures during rare disease clinical trial design.POWER 工具:在罕见病临床试验设计中选择相关结局指标时纳入患者代表的建议。
Health Policy. 2018 Dec;122(12):1287-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
8
Personalized medicine: motivation, challenges, and progress.个性化医学:动机、挑战与进展。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):952-963. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.006.
9
Patient reported outcome measures in rare diseases: a narrative review.罕见病患者报告结局测量指标:叙事性综述。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Apr 23;13(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0810-x.
10
Assessments of neurocognitive and behavioral function in the mucopolysaccharidoses.黏多糖贮积症的神经认知和行为功能评估。
Mol Genet Metab. 2017 Dec;122S:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 15.