Seixas Brayan V, Freitas Gabriel R
BPharm, MSc. Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Los Angeles, CA (United States).
BPharm, MSc, PhD. Graduate Program of Public Health, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba. João Pessoa (Brazil).
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):2168. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2168. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
Polypharmacy has become an increasingly public health issue as population age and novel drugs are developed. Yet, evidence on low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is still scarce.
This work aims to estimate the prevalence of polypharmacy among Brazilians aged 50 and over, and investigate associated factors.
A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the baseline assessment of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil), a nationally representative study of persons aged 50 years and older (n=9,412). Univariate and bivariate analyses described the sample. Robust Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios and predict probabilities of polypharmacy.
Prevalence of polypharmacy was estimated at 13.5% among older adults in Brazil. Important disparities were observed in regard to gender (16.1% among women and 10.5% among men), race (16.0% among whites and 10.1% among blacks) and geographic region (ranging from 5.1% in the North to 18.7% in the South). The multivariate analysis showed that polypharmacy is associated with various sociodemographic/individual factors (age, gender, race, education, region, health status, body mass index) as well as with several variables of healthcare access/utilization (number of visits, same physician, provider's knowledge of patient's medications, gate-keeper, and difficulty managing own medication). Overall, the more utilization of health services, the higher the probability of polypharmacy, after adjusting for all other model covariates.
Polypharmacy prevalence is relatively low in Brazil, compared to European countries. After controlling for variables of healthcare need and demographic characteristics, there is still substantial residual variance in polypharmacy prevalence. Policies to identify inappropriate prescribing and reduce regional discrepancies are necessary.
随着人口老龄化和新型药物的研发,多重用药已成为一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。然而,关于低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的证据仍然匮乏。
本研究旨在估计巴西50岁及以上人群中多重用药的患病率,并调查相关因素。
采用巴西老龄化纵向研究(ELSI-巴西)基线评估数据进行横断面研究,该研究是一项针对50岁及以上人群的全国代表性研究(n = 9412)。单变量和双变量分析描述了样本情况。采用稳健泊松回归估计患病率比并预测多重用药的概率。
巴西老年人中多重用药的患病率估计为13.5%。在性别(女性为16.1%,男性为10.5%)、种族(白人为16.0%,黑人为10.1%)和地理区域(从北部的5.1%到南部的18.7%)方面观察到了重要差异。多变量分析表明,多重用药与各种社会人口学/个体因素(年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、地区、健康状况、体重指数)以及一些医疗服务获取/利用变量(就诊次数、同一位医生、提供者对患者用药的了解、看门人以及自行管理药物的困难程度)相关。总体而言,在对所有其他模型协变量进行调整后,卫生服务利用越多,多重用药的概率越高。
与欧洲国家相比,巴西的多重用药患病率相对较低。在控制了医疗需求变量和人口特征后,多重用药患病率仍存在大量剩余差异。有必要制定政策以识别不适当的处方并减少地区差异。