肾脏损伤患者降尿酸治疗的疗效与安全性:一项由全球痛风与高尿酸血症网络(GCAN)发起的文献综述

Efficacy and safety of urate-lowering therapy in people with kidney impairment: a GCAN-initiated literature review.

作者信息

Farquhar Hamish, Vargas-Santos Ana B, Pisaniello Huai Leng, Fisher Mark, Hill Catherine, Gaffo Angelo L, Stamp Lisa K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Department of Internal Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2021 Jan 4;5(1):rkaa073. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkaa073. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy, defined as achieving target serum urate <6.0 mg/dl, and safety of urate-lowering therapies (ULTs) for people with gout and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5.

METHODS

PubMed, The Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched from 1 January 1959 to 31 January 2018 for studies that enrolled people with gout, who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or creatinine clearance (CrCl) of <60 ml/min and exposure to allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid, benzbromarone, lesinurad or pegloticase. All study designs other than case reports were included, except for people on dialysis, for whom we did include case reports.

RESULTS

There were 36 reports with an analysis of efficacy and/or safety based upon renal function: allopurinol ( = 12), febuxostat ( = 10), probenecid ( = 3), benzbromarone ( = 5), lesinurad ( = 5) and pegloticase ( = 1). There were 108 reports that involved people with gout and renal impairment but did not contain any analysis on efficacy and/or safety based upon renal function: allopurinol ( = 84), febuxostat ( = 14), benzbromarone ( = 1), lesinurad ( = 3) and pegloticase ( = 6). Most studies excluded people with more severe degrees of renal impairment (eGFR or CrCl of <30 ml/min). For allopurinol, in particular, there was significant variability in the dose of drug used and the efficacy in terms of urate lowering, across all levels of renal impairment.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy and/or safety of currently used ULTs according to different levels of renal function. Future studies should include patients with CKD and should report study outcomes stratified by renal function.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估降尿酸治疗(ULTs)对痛风合并慢性肾脏病(CKD)3 - 5期患者的疗效(定义为血清尿酸水平降至<6.0 mg/dl)及安全性。

方法

检索1959年1月1日至2018年1月31日期间的PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和EMBASE数据库,纳入痛风患者,其估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)或肌酐清除率(CrCl)<60 ml/min,且接受别嘌醇、非布司他、丙磺舒、苯溴马隆、雷西纳德或聚乙二醇重组尿酸酶治疗。除病例报告外,所有研究设计均纳入,接受透析的患者纳入病例报告。

结果

有36篇报告基于肾功能分析了疗效和/或安全性:别嘌醇(n = 12)、非布司他(n = 10)、丙磺舒(n = 3)、苯溴马隆(n = 5)、雷西纳德(n = 5)和聚乙二醇重组尿酸酶(n = 1)。有108篇报告涉及痛风合并肾功能损害患者,但未包含基于肾功能的疗效和/或安全性分析:别嘌醇(n = 84)、非布司他(n = 14)、苯溴马隆(n = 1)、雷西纳德(n = 3)和聚乙二醇重组尿酸酶(n = 6)。大多数研究排除了肾功能损害更严重(eGFR或CrCl<30 ml/min)的患者。特别是别嘌醇,在所有肾功能损害水平上,所用药物剂量和降尿酸疗效存在显著差异。

结论

目前缺乏关于根据不同肾功能水平使用ULTs的疗效和/或安全性的证据。未来研究应纳入CKD患者,并应报告按肾功能分层的研究结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索