Suppr超能文献

美国放射肿瘤护士教育评估。

Assessment of Radiation Oncology Nurse Education in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Jul 1;110(3):667-671. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.031. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Nurses in the radiation oncology (RO) clinic have a critical role in the management of patients receiving radiation therapy. However, limited data exist regarding the exposure of nurses to RO during training and the current educational needs of practicing RO nurses. This study assesses nurses' prior RO education, participation in national training efforts, and perceived educational needs.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A web-based survey using a 5-point Likert-type scale was distributed to RO nurses at 3 academic medical centers. Questions focused on prior education experiences, clinical areas of strength/weakness, and perceived value of future educational interventions. Likert-type scores are reported as median (interquartile range), and a Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to assess for significant differences in responses.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 39 of 54 (72%). Respondents were 90% female and trained at 30 nursing schools in 17 states. Only 5% of nurses reported a curriculum in nursing school with RO content, and nearly all (97%) received their RO education on the job. Forty-one percent of nurses completed the Oncology Nursing Society radiation therapy certificate course, and only 5% completed the American Society for Radiation Oncology nursing module. Nurses felt most confident in the overall management of patients with breast (4 [3-4]), prostate (4 [3-5]), and central nervous system (4 [3-4]) cancers and least confident for lymphoma (3 [2-4]), gynecologic (3 [2-4]), and head and neck cancers (3 [2-4]; P < .01). Nurses rated didactic lectures from physicians (5 [3-5]), shadowing RO residents (4 [3-5]), and working with simulation therapists (4 [3-5]) as valuable components to include in a training curriculum (P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing school exposure to RO is limited, and only a minority of RO nurses complete RO-specific training or certification available from national organizations. This study identifies several areas of perceived clinical nursing strengths and weaknesses that can be used to inform the design of future RO nursing educational programs.

摘要

目的

放射肿瘤学(RO)诊所的护士在管理接受放射治疗的患者方面发挥着关键作用。然而,关于护士在培训期间接受 RO 暴露的有限数据以及 RO 护士的当前教育需求。本研究评估了护士的 RO 教育背景、参与国家培训工作以及感知的教育需求。

方法和材料

在 3 家学术医疗中心,向 RO 护士分发了一份基于网络的调查,采用 5 分李克特量表。问题集中在先前的教育经验、临床优势/劣势领域以及对未来教育干预措施的感知价值。李克特量表评分报告为中位数(四分位距),并进行 Kruskal-Wallis 检验以评估响应是否存在显著差异。

结果

调查的回复率为 54 名中的 39 名(72%)。受访者 90%为女性,在 17 个州的 30 所护理学校接受培训。只有 5%的护士报告在护理学校的课程中有 RO 内容,并且几乎所有(97%)都是在职接受的 RO 教育。41%的护士完成了肿瘤护理协会放射治疗证书课程,只有 5%的护士完成了美国放射肿瘤学会护理模块。护士对管理乳腺癌(4 [3-4])、前列腺癌(4 [3-5])和中枢神经系统癌(4 [3-4])的患者最有信心,对管理淋巴瘤(3 [2-4])、妇科(3 [2-4])和头颈部癌症(3 [2-4])的患者最没有信心(P <.01)。护士将医生的讲座(5 [3-5])、RO 住院医师的观摩(4 [3-5])和与模拟治疗师一起工作(4 [3-5])评为纳入培训课程的有价值组成部分(P =.08)。

结论

护理学校对 RO 的接触有限,只有少数 RO 护士完成了国家组织提供的 RO 特定培训或认证。本研究确定了几个感知到的临床护理优势和劣势领域,可用于为未来的 RO 护理教育计划提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验