Suppr超能文献

接受肺静脉隔离标准消融的心房颤动患者中非肺静脉病灶的存在:临床特征和长期消融结果。

Presence of non-pulmonary vein foci in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing standard ablation of pulmonary vein isolation: Clinical characteristics and long-term ablation outcome.

作者信息

Inamura Yukihiro, Nitta Junichi, Inaba Osamu, Sato Akira, Takamiya Tomomasa, Murata Kazuya, Ikenouchi Takashi, Kono Toshikazu, Matsumura Yutaka, Takahashi Yoshihide, Goya Masahiko, Sasano Tetsuo

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Saitama Hospital, Saitama, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jan 21;32:100717. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100717. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical characteristics of atrial fibrillation (AF) resulting from non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with AF caused by non-PV triggers, localization of non-PV foci, clinical differences, and clinical outcomes after catheter ablation in each AF focus.

METHODS

A total of 2967 patients who underwent initial catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF were examined. After PV isolation, all patients underwent high-dose isoproterenol infusion to assess the existence of non-PV foci.

RESULTS

Non-PV foci were identified in 564 patients (19.2%). The localization of successfully ablated non-PV foci in 514 patients were the superior vena cava (SVC: 213 cases), interatrial septum (IAS: 125 cases), coronary sinus (CS: 98 cases), right atrium (RA: 125 cases), left atrium (LA: 114 cases), and unmappable (50 cases). Multivariate analysis revealed that female gender, low body mass index (BMI), non-paroxysmal AF (PAF), and sick sinus syndrome were independent and significant indicators of non-PV foci. In the multivariate analysis of each AF focus, female gender, low BMI, and non-PAF were significant predictors of IAS and CS foci, RA and IAS foci, and CS foci, respectively. In addition, dilatation of the LA was significantly associated with LA foci, whereas RA, LA, IAS, and CS foci were associated with AF recurrence.

CONCLUSION

These findings could help to identify patients at a higher risk of AF caused by non-PV triggers and clarify the clinical difference according to the localization of non-PV foci.

摘要

背景

由非肺静脉(PV)触发灶导致的心房颤动(AF)的临床特征尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估由非PV触发灶引起的AF患者的临床特征、非PV病灶的定位、临床差异以及各AF病灶导管消融后的临床结局。

方法

共检查了2967例接受阵发性或持续性AF初次导管消融的患者。在PV隔离后,所有患者接受大剂量异丙肾上腺素输注以评估非PV病灶的存在。

结果

在564例患者(19.2%)中发现了非PV病灶。514例成功消融的非PV病灶的定位为上腔静脉(SVC:213例)、房间隔(IAS:125例)、冠状窦(CS:98例)、右心房(RA:125例)、左心房(LA:114例)和无法标测(50例)。多因素分析显示,女性、低体重指数(BMI)、非阵发性AF(PAF)和病态窦房结综合征是非PV病灶的独立且显著指标。在各AF病灶的多因素分析中,女性、低BMI和非PAF分别是IAS和CS病灶、RA和IAS病灶以及CS病灶的显著预测因素。此外,LA扩张与LA病灶显著相关,而RA、LA、IAS和CS病灶与AF复发相关。

结论

这些发现有助于识别由非PV触发灶引起AF的高风险患者,并根据非PV病灶的定位阐明临床差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e48b/7822950/afe0c103e465/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验