Schwartz Ruben H, Southerland Warren, Urits Ivan, Kaye Alan D, Viswanath Omar, Yazdi Cyrus
Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida.
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Surg J (N Y). 2021 Feb 1;7(1):e11-e13. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722179. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Spinal cord stimulation is an effective treatment modality for patients with numerous pain conditions. Although proven to be highly successful, device implantation does come with some inherent risks. One of the most challenging complications is perioperative infection. For most patients, a simple trial of oral antibiotics and in-office drainage of any superficial infectious material may be sufficient. Deeper infections with wound dehiscence necessitate device removal and intravenous antibiotic therapy. The question remains, if the device was previously providing pain relief for the patient, when is the appropriate time to reimplant the device after the infection has cleared? We describe the case of explantation of an infected device and successful reimplantation after 1 year.
脊髓刺激是治疗多种疼痛病症患者的一种有效治疗方式。尽管已被证明非常成功,但设备植入确实存在一些固有风险。最具挑战性的并发症之一是围手术期感染。对于大多数患者,简单试用口服抗生素并在门诊排出任何浅表感染物质可能就足够了。伴有伤口裂开的深部感染则需要取出设备并进行静脉抗生素治疗。问题仍然存在,如果该设备之前为患者缓解了疼痛,那么在感染清除后何时重新植入设备才合适呢?我们描述了一例感染设备取出并在1年后成功重新植入的病例。