Suppr超能文献

改良超滤与常规超滤联合对小儿心脏手术围术期临床结局的影响:Meta 分析。

Effects of modified ultrafiltration and conventional ultrafiltration combination on perioperative clinical outcomes in pediatric cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology.

Department of Obstetrics.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 22;100(3):e24221. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024221.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was performed to review the effects of the addition of modified ultrafiltration (MUF) and conventional ultrafiltration (CUF) to CUF alone on postoperative hemoglobin, surgical and ultrafiltration data, and postoperative clinical outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to identify randomized controlled clinical trials that compared MUF and CUF combination with CUF alone in pediatric cardiac surgery undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science without any language or date limitation in February 2020. For each included trial, the primary outcomes including post-CPB and postoperative hematocrit, surgical and ultrafiltration data, postoperative clinical outcomes including volume of chest tube drainage within 48 hours after surgery and perioperative blood requirement, ventilation support duration, and length of stay day in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital were collected and analyzed. The analysis was conducted using STATA version 12.0.

RESULTS

A total of 8 trials encompassing 405 patients were included in this analysis. Analysis indicated that MUF + CUF increased the post-CPB hematocrit (Standard mean difference, SMD = 1.85, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.91-2.79). Meanwhile, ultrafiltration volume was higher in CUF+MUF infants than CUF-alone infants (SMD = 1.46, 95% CI 0.51-2.41, P = .003). The clinical outcomes, including postoperative hemodynamic changes, prime volume, blood requirement, chest tube drainage volume, mechanical ventilation duration, and ICU duration, were unclear because of the unstable sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Beneficial effects of using MUF and CUF for pediatric cardiac surgery, including increase post-CPB hematocrit and ultrafiltration volume when compared with CUF alone. Meanwhile, MUF and CUF did not significantly influence the postoperative hospital stay duration, CPB, and aortic occlusion duration.

摘要

背景

本荟萃分析旨在回顾改良超滤(MUF)和常规超滤(CUF)联合 CUF 对行体外循环(CPB)心脏手术的儿科患者术后血红蛋白、手术和超滤数据及术后临床结局的影响。

方法

系统检索 2020 年 2 月在 PubMed、Embase、 Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 中发表的比较 MUF 和 CUF 联合与 CUF 单独用于 CPB 下心脏手术的随机对照临床试验,不限制语言和日期。对于每项纳入的试验,均收集并分析主要结局,包括 CPB 后和术后红细胞压积、手术和超滤数据、术后临床结局,包括术后 48 小时内胸腔引流管引流量和围术期血液需求、通气支持持续时间以及 ICU 和住院天数。分析采用 STATA 版本 12.0。

结果

共纳入 8 项试验,共计 405 例患者。分析表明,MUF+CUF 增加 CPB 后红细胞压积(标准均数差,SMD=1.85,95%置信区间,95%CI 0.91-2.79)。同时,与 CUF 组相比,CUF+MUF 组婴儿超滤量更高(SMD=1.46,95%CI 0.51-2.41,P=0.003)。由于敏感性分析不稳定,术后血流动力学变化、基础液量、血液需求、胸腔引流管引流量、机械通气时间和 ICU 时间等临床结局尚不清楚。

结论

与 CUF 相比,MUF 和 CUF 联合应用于儿科心脏手术具有增加 CPB 后红细胞压积和超滤量的有益效果。同时,MUF 和 CUF 对术后住院时间、CPB 和主动脉阻断时间无显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d319/7837856/8c174dad3802/medi-100-e24221-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验