Department of Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2021;78(1):103-116. doi: 10.3233/CH-201031.
To assess the impact and procedural input of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and ultrasound elastography on surgical decision making during the procedure and consequently the outcome after hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery.
Data of 50 consecutive patients, who underwent HPB surgery from 04/2018 to 07/2018 were prospectively collected for this study. During surgery, IOUS with a high-resolution ultrasound device using CEUS after bolus injection of 2.4-5 ml dulphur hexafluoride microbubbles using a 6-9 MHz probe and a share wave and strain elastography was performed by an experienced examiner. Process and time analysis were carried out using mobile phone timer.
The IOUS with CEUS and elastography correctly identified 42 malignant tumors and 4 benign lesions. In 3 cases, the examination provided false positive result (identifying 3 benign lesions as malignant) and in 1 case a malignant lesion was incorrectly assessed as benign (sensitivity 97,7%, specificity 57,1%, PPV 93,3% and NPV 80%).The specific question by the surgeon could be answered successfully in 98% of the cases. In 76% of the cases, there was a modification (42%) or a fundamental change (34%) of the planned surgical approach due to the information provided by the IOUS. Within the last group, the IOUS had a major impact on therapy outcome. In 7 patients an additional tumor resection was required, in 5 patients the tumor was assessed as inoperable, and in total in 5 patients an intraoperative RFA (4/5) or postoperative RITA (1/5) was required.Regarding procedural input, there was only a slight, but significant difference between the transport and set-up times before the intraoperative use (mean: 14 min 22 s) and the return transport (mean 13 min 6 s), (p = 0,038). The average examination time was 14 minutes, which makes only one third of the overall time demand.
Combination of IOUS with CEUS and elastography in oncological HPB surgery provides valuable information that affects surgical decision-making. The procedural input of about 45 minutes seems to be a good investment considering the improvement of the surgical procedure and a significant modification of the therapy approach in the majority of the cases.
评估术中超声(IOUS)联合对比增强超声(CEUS)和超声弹性成像在手术过程中对手术决策的影响和程序投入,进而影响肝胆胰外科(HPB)手术后的结果。
前瞻性收集了 2018 年 4 月至 7 月期间连续 50 例接受 HPB 手术患者的数据。在手术过程中,使用高分辨率超声设备进行 IOUS,在经皮注射 2.4-5ml 六氟化硫微泡后使用 6-9MHz 探头和相控阵及应变弹性成像,由经验丰富的检查人员进行操作。使用手机定时器进行过程和时间分析。
IOUS 联合 CEUS 和弹性成像正确识别出 42 个恶性肿瘤和 4 个良性病变。在 3 例中,检查结果出现假阳性(将 3 个良性病变误判为恶性),1 例恶性病变被错误地评估为良性(敏感性 97.7%,特异性 57.1%,PPV 93.3%,NPV 80%)。98%的情况下,外科医生的具体问题都能得到成功解答。在 76%的情况下,由于 IOUS 提供的信息,手术方式发生了修改(42%)或根本性改变(34%)。在最后一组中,IOUS 对治疗结果有重大影响。在 7 例中需要进行额外的肿瘤切除,在 5 例中肿瘤被评估为无法手术,总共有 5 例患者需要术中射频消融(4/5)或术后射频消融治疗(1/5)。在程序投入方面,在使用 IOUS 之前的转运和设置时间(平均 14 分 22 秒)与返回转运时间(平均 13 分 6 秒)之间只有轻微但显著的差异(p=0.038)。检查时间平均为 14 分钟,仅占总时间需求的三分之一。
在肿瘤 HPB 手术中联合使用 IOUS 联合 CEUS 和弹性成像可提供有价值的信息,影响手术决策。考虑到手术过程的改善和大多数情况下治疗方法的显著改变,约 45 分钟的程序投入似乎是一个很好的投资。