• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低功率、纯切模式的单极电外科术和缝合线在预防背阔肌肌皮瓣采集后血清肿形成中的疗效。

Efficacy of Low Power, Pure Cut Mode of Monopolar Electrosurgery and Quilting Sutures for Preventing Seroma Formation After Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Harvest.

机构信息

From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Mar 1;86(3):265-267. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002545.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002545
PMID:33555680
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (LD) flaps are widely used in breast reconstruction surgery. However, seromas often form postoperatively at the donor site as a complication. This study aimed to determine the impact of different electrocautery modes during flap elevation, with or without subsequent quilting sutures, on postoperative seroma formation.

METHODS

Subjects were 112 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with LD flaps after breast-conserving surgery between April 2015 and January 2019. Group A consisted of 21 patients who underwent LD flap elevation using the fulgurate mode, and group B consisted of 25 patients who underwent flap elevation using the lower power, pure cut mode. Group C consisted of 66 patients who underwent flap elevation with the lower power, pure cut mode combined with quilting sutures for wound closure.

RESULTS

Mean 1-week postoperative back drain volume and the mean number of days to drain removal in group B were significantly reduced relative to those in group A (group A, 752.3 mL and 16.9 days, respectively; group B, 552.2 mL and 10.6 days, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). Group C, which included quilting sutures, had even lower values than group B (459.7 mL and 7.4 days, respectively; group B vs group C: P = 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively). Significant differences were observed between groups for postoperative seroma formation at the flap donor site (group A, 16 [76.2%] of 21 patients; group B, 11 [44%] 25 patients; group C, 4 [6.1%] of 66 patients; A vs B: P < 0.001, B vs C: P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of low power, pure cut mode for LD flap harvest, combined with quilting sutures, effectively shortened the time to drain removal and suppressed seroma formation. Given that specialized devices and materials are not required, this combination may reduce both patient burden and medical costs.

摘要

背景

背阔肌肌皮瓣(LD)在乳房重建术中被广泛应用。然而,术后供区常出现血清肿等并发症。本研究旨在确定在皮瓣掀起过程中采用不同电切模式(有或无后续缝合)对术后血清肿形成的影响。

方法

112 例患者于 2015 年 4 月至 2019 年 1 月因保乳术后行即刻乳房重建而接受 LD 皮瓣,将其分为三组:A 组 21 例采用电灼模式掀起皮瓣,B 组 25 例采用低功率、纯切模式掀起皮瓣,C 组 66 例采用低功率、纯切模式掀起皮瓣并缝合关闭伤口。

结果

B 组术后 1 周引流总量及引流管拔除时间均明显少于 A 组(A 组分别为 752.3 mL 和 16.9 天,B 组分别为 552.2 mL 和 10.6 天;均 P<0.001),而 C 组(缝合组)的引流总量及引流管拔除时间进一步减少(459.7 mL 和 7.4 天;B 组与 C 组比较:P=0.03 和 P<0.001)。各组术后供区皮瓣血清肿形成发生率有显著差异(A 组 21 例中 16 例[76.2%],B 组 25 例中 11 例[44%],C 组 66 例中 4 例[6.1%];A 组与 B 组比较:P<0.001,B 组与 C 组比较:P<0.001)。

结论

采用低功率、纯切模式掀起 LD 皮瓣,并缝合关闭伤口,可有效缩短引流管拔除时间,减少血清肿形成。该方法无需特殊设备和材料,可减轻患者负担和医疗费用。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Low Power, Pure Cut Mode of Monopolar Electrosurgery and Quilting Sutures for Preventing Seroma Formation After Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Harvest.低功率、纯切模式的单极电外科术和缝合线在预防背阔肌肌皮瓣采集后血清肿形成中的疗效。
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Mar 1;86(3):265-267. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002545.
2
A Prospective Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Fibrin Glue, Triamcinolone Acetonide, and Quilting Sutures in Seroma Prevention after Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction.一项关于纤维蛋白胶、曲安奈德和褥式缝合预防背阔肌乳房重建术后血清肿疗效的前瞻性随机试验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr;139(4):854e-863e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003213.
3
Effects of Quilting Suture Interval on Donor Site Seromas After Breast Reconstruction With Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap: A Randomized Trial.背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房重建术后缝边间距对供区血清肿的影响:一项随机试验
Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Dec;16(6):e159-e164. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Fibrin Sealants and Quilting Suture for Prevention of Seroma Formation Following Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Harvest: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.用于预防背阔肌切取术后血清肿形成的纤维蛋白封闭剂和褥式缝合:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;39(3):399-409. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0476-x. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
5
Comparison of Donor Site Drainage Duration and Seroma Rate Between Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flaps and Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flaps.背阔肌肌皮瓣与胸背动脉穿支皮瓣供区引流持续时间及血清肿发生率的比较。
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Aug;79(2):183-185. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001077.
6
Latissimus dorsi seroma prevention with running quilting suture using barbed suture.使用带倒刺缝线行连续锁边缝合预防背阔肌血清肿。
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2024 May;69(3):239-248. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2023.06.011. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
7
Reducing the seroma volume by quilting suture after breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap: Single institutional experience.背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房重建术后采用褥式缝合减少血清肿体积:单机构经验
Bull Cancer. 2020 May;107(5):543-550. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
8
Feasibility of use of a barbed suture (v-loc 180) for quilting the donor site in latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.倒刺缝线(v-loc 180)用于在背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房重建术中缝合供区的可行性。
Arch Plast Surg. 2013 Mar;40(2):117-22. doi: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.2.117. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
9
Latissimus dorsi donor-site morbidity: the combination of quilting and fibrin sealant reduce length of drain placement and seroma rate.背阔肌供区并发症:缝合法与纤维蛋白封闭剂联合使用可减少引流管放置时间和血清肿发生率。
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Jun;68(6):555-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318216b65c.
10
Usefulness of the LigaSure™ small jaw sealing device for breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap.LigaSure™小颌封闭装置在背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房重建中的应用价值。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2019 Oct;53(5):295-300. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2019.1612753. Epub 2019 May 7.