Mysiw W J, Colachis S C
Dept. of Physical Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 Apr;67(2):50-4. doi: 10.1097/00002060-198804000-00004.
Nerve conduction studies of the anterior interosseous nerve were performed on 26 healthy subjects (6 women and 20 men, aged 24 to 63 years). The compound muscle action potential from the pronator quadratus muscle was obtained by using surface electrodes placed over the dorsal aspect of the distal forearm and median nerve stimulation at the elbow. The latency of the evoked potential was determined over distances that ranged from 17.5-28 cm from the elbow to the pronator quadratus muscle; this resulted in latencies of 3.5 ms (+/- 0.4) and 3.6 ms (+/- 0.4) for the left and right extremities, respectively, with a side-to-side difference of 0.1 ms (+/- 0.1). The amplitude of the potentials recorded was 3.1 mV (+/- 0.8); a difference in amplitude of 11.4% (+/- 7.7%) between extremities was seen. Although duration measurements were obtained, the frequent presence of biomodal peaks made interpretation difficult. This bimodal pattern was felt to represent either two heads of the pronator quadratus or another muscle innervated by the anterior interosseous nerve. The technique in the present study is easy to perform, allows better assessment of the compound muscle action potentials obtained and provides for side-to-side comparisons of latency and amplitude. This technique aids the electromyographer in evaluation of suspected cases of injury to the anterior interosseous nerve, particularly in unilateral cases.
对26名健康受试者(6名女性和20名男性,年龄在24至63岁之间)进行了骨间前神经的神经传导研究。通过将表面电极置于前臂远端背侧并在肘部刺激正中神经,获得了来自旋前方肌的复合肌肉动作电位。在从肘部到旋前方肌距离为17.5 - 28厘米的范围内测定诱发电位的潜伏期;结果左、右上肢的潜伏期分别为3.5毫秒(±0.4)和3.6毫秒(±0.4),两侧差异为0.1毫秒(±0.1)。记录的电位幅度为3.1毫伏(±0.8);两侧之间的幅度差异为11.4%(±7.7%)。尽管进行了时程测量,但双峰峰的频繁出现使解释变得困难。这种双峰模式被认为代表旋前方肌的两个头或由骨间前神经支配的另一块肌肉。本研究中的技术易于操作,能更好地评估所获得的复合肌肉动作电位,并能对潜伏期和幅度进行双侧比较。该技术有助于肌电图检查人员评估疑似骨间前神经损伤的病例,特别是单侧病例。