• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

萨尔斯堡标准,在非惊厥性癫痫持续状态诊断中的有用工具:一项回顾性研究。

Salzburg Criteria, A Useful Tool in Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Clin EEG Neurosci. 2021 Nov;52(6):422-426. doi: 10.1177/1550059421991710. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1177/1550059421991710
PMID:33557615
Abstract

. Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) has been traditionally a challenging electroencephalographic (EEG) diagnosis. For this reason, Salzburg consensus criteria (SCC) have been proposed to facilitate correct diagnosis. . We retrospectively reanalyzed 41 cases referred to our department (from 2016 to 2018) under the suspicion of NCSE. In this study, we compared the original description (standard criteria) versus the updated description (SCC) of the same EEG. . Originally, 15 patients were diagnosed as NCSE (37%) and 26 patients as no NCSE (63%), using the standard criteria. Then, we analyzed EEGs according to the SCC, which led to the following results: 9 patients fulfilled the criteria for definite NCSE (22%), 20 patients were diagnosed as possible NCSE (49%) and 12 patients were diagnosed as no NCSE (29%). Subsequently, when we analyze the outcome of possible NCSE cases, we note that 50% of these patients presented mild-poor outcome (neurological deficits, deceased). Indeed, we observed worse outcomes in patients previously diagnosed as no NCSE and untreated, specifically post-anoxic cases. . Salzburg criteria seem to be a useful tool to support NCSE diagnosis, introducing the category of possible NCSE. In our study, we observed that it contributes to improving the prognosis and management of the patients. However, more prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the accuracy of SCC.

摘要

. 非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)一直是一种具有挑战性的脑电图(EEG)诊断。出于这个原因,提出了萨尔斯堡共识标准(SCC)来帮助正确诊断。. 我们回顾性地重新分析了 41 例在我院(2016 年至 2018 年)就诊的疑似 NCSE 患者的病例。在这项研究中,我们比较了同一 EEG 的原始描述(标准标准)与更新描述(SCC)。. 最初,15 名患者被诊断为 NCSE(37%),26 名患者被诊断为非 NCSE(63%),使用标准标准。然后,我们根据 SCC 分析 EEG,结果如下:9 名患者符合明确 NCSE 的标准(22%),20 名患者被诊断为可能的 NCSE(49%),12 名患者被诊断为非 NCSE(29%)。随后,当我们分析可能的 NCSE 病例的结果时,我们注意到这些患者中有 50%的预后不良(神经功能缺损,死亡)。事实上,我们观察到未被诊断为非 NCSE 和未经治疗的患者,特别是缺氧后患者的预后更差。. 萨尔斯堡标准似乎是支持 NCSE 诊断的有用工具,引入了可能的 NCSE 类别。在我们的研究中,我们观察到它有助于改善患者的预后和管理。然而,需要更多的前瞻性研究来证明 SCC 的准确性。

相似文献

1
Salzburg Criteria, A Useful Tool in Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study.萨尔斯堡标准,在非惊厥性癫痫持续状态诊断中的有用工具:一项回顾性研究。
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2021 Nov;52(6):422-426. doi: 10.1177/1550059421991710. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of the Salzburg EEG criteria for non-convulsive status epilepticus: a retrospective study.萨尔斯堡 EEG 标准对非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的诊断准确性:一项回顾性研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Sep;15(10):1054-62. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30137-5. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
3
Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus: Validating the Salzburg Criteria Against an Expert EEG Examiner.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态:对照专家脑电图检查验证萨尔茨堡标准
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Mar;36(2):141-145. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000556.
4
The EEG diagnosis of NCSE: Concordance between clinical practice and Salzburg Criteria for NCSE.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的脑电图诊断:临床实践与萨尔茨堡非惊厥性癫痫持续状态标准的一致性
Seizure. 2020 Jul;79:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
5
Salzburg Consensus Criteria for Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus--approach to clinical application.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的萨尔茨堡共识标准——临床应用方法
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
6
Electroclinical patterns in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Etiology, treatment, and outcome.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态患者的电临床特征:病因、治疗和结局。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jan;114(Pt A):107611. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107611. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
7
Salzburg consensus criteria are associated with long-term outcome after non-convulsive status epilepticus.萨尔茨堡共识标准与非惊厥性癫痫持续状态后的长期预后相关。
Seizure. 2022 Jul;99:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Cortical and thalamic hyper-perfusion in non-convulsive status epilepticus. Relationship between perfusion CT patterns and Salzburg EEG criteria.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态中的皮质和丘脑高灌注。灌注 CT 模式与萨尔茨堡 EEG 标准之间的关系。
Seizure. 2021 Nov;92:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
9
Prevalence of non-convulsive seizures and electroencephalographic abnormalities in critically ill patients-A retrospective observational study.危重症患者非惊厥性癫痫发作和脑电图异常的患病率——一项回顾性观察研究
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Feb;9(1):325-332. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12876. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
10
Pragmatic computerised perfusion diagnostics for non-convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective observational study.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的实用计算机化灌注诊断:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 12;95(5):471-476. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332152.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonconvulsive status epilepticus characteristics in glioma patients: a retrospective study.胶质瘤患者非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的特征:一项回顾性研究。
Discov Oncol. 2023 Mar 7;14(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s12672-023-00632-3.
2
Status epilepticus: review on diagnosis, monitoring and treatment.癫痫持续状态:诊断、监测和治疗综述。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022 May;80(5 Suppl 1):193-203. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2022-S113.