• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BRCA 基因突变状态与乳腺癌患者生存的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Association between BRCA mutational status and survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Breast Center, Peking University, People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;186(3):591-605. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06104-y. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-021-06104-y
PMID:33559780
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating role of BRCA mutations on the survival outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients have given confounding results and hence, in this meta-analysis, we assessed the impact of BRCA mutations on survival in BC patients.

METHODS

Studies comparing survival outcomes of BC patients having BRCA mutations against wildtype BRCA phenotype were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCCS) were the outcomes. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed for survival based on triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and follow-up durations. The meta-analysis was performed as per PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Altogether, 30 articles with 35,972 patients (mean age 45.6 years) were included. Patients with BRCA 1 mutation had significantly lower OS (HR [95% CI] 1.2 [1.08, 1.33]; P < 0.001), BRCA 2 mutation had significantly lower DFS (HR [95% CI] 1.35 [1.1, 1.67]; P = 0.0049) and BCSS (HR [95%CI] 1.46 [1.26, 1.7]; P < 0.0001), and TNBC patients with BRCA 1 mutation had significantly poor DFS (HR [95% CI] 1.65 [1.08, 2.54]; P = 0.0216). Based on follow-up duration, the OS in BRCA 1-mutated patients revealed significantly poorer outcomes in studies with ≤ 5 years (HR 1.48) and > 5 years (HR 1.14) of follow-up. In BRCA 2 -mutated patients, the OS was significantly poorer in studies with > 5 years of follow-up (HR 1.39, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BC patients with BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations had poor survival outcomes and hence screening patients with BC for BRCA mutations might help in strategizing their treatment and improving their survival.

摘要

背景

评估 BRCA 突变对乳腺癌(BC)患者生存结果的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果,因此,在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了 BRCA 突变对 BC 患者生存的影响。

方法

从 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 中检索了比较携带 BRCA 突变与野生型 BRCA 表型的 BC 患者生存结果的研究。总生存(OS)、无病生存(DFS)、远处转移无复发生存(DMFS)和乳腺癌特异性生存(BCCS)是观察结果。使用风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)进行分析。根据三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)和随访时间进行亚组分析。荟萃分析按照 PRISMA 指南进行。

结果

总共纳入了 30 篇文章,共 35972 名患者(平均年龄 45.6 岁)。BRCA1 突变患者的 OS 显著降低(HR [95%CI] 1.2 [1.08, 1.33];P < 0.001),BRCA2 突变患者的 DFS 和 BCCS 显著降低(HR [95%CI] 1.35 [1.1, 1.67];P = 0.0049),BRCA1 突变的 TNBC 患者的 DFS 显著降低(HR [95%CI] 1.65 [1.08, 2.54];P = 0.0216)。根据随访时间,BRCA1 突变患者的 OS 在随访时间≤5 年(HR 1.48)和>5 年(HR 1.14)的研究中显示出更差的结果。BRCA2 突变患者的 OS 在随访时间>5 年的研究中显著更差(HR 1.39,P < 0.05)。

结论

携带 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变的 BC 患者生存结果较差,因此对 BC 患者进行 BRCA 突变筛查可能有助于制定治疗策略并提高其生存率。

相似文献

1
Association between BRCA mutational status and survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BRCA 基因突变状态与乳腺癌患者生存的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;186(3):591-605. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06104-y. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
3
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.对携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变的女性进行降低风险的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2.
4
Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression and outcomes in early breast cancer: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.表皮生长因子受体过表达与早期乳腺癌结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Jan;62:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
5
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
6
Impact of platinum-based chemotherapy on the prognosis of early triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.铂类化疗对早期三阴性乳腺癌预后的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Med. 2023 Oct;23(6):2025-2040. doi: 10.1007/s10238-022-00940-y. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
7
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.治疗胶质母细胞瘤进展或复发的选择:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;5(1):CD013579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013579.pub2.
8
Systemic therapies for preventing or treating aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms in early breast cancer.用于预防或治疗早期乳腺癌中芳香化酶抑制剂引起的肌肉骨骼症状的系统治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 10;1(1):CD013167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013167.pub2.
9
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving anthracyclines.右雷佐生预防或减少接受蒽环类抗生素治疗的癌症成人和儿童的心脏毒性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 27;9(9):CD014638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014638.pub2.
10
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer.聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂治疗卵巢癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 16;2(2):CD007929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007929.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment, outcomes, and resource utilization among patients with metastatic breast and advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, by BRCA1/2 and HRD status.根据BRCA1/2和HRD状态,转移性乳腺癌和晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者的治疗、结局及资源利用情况
Oncologist. 2025 Aug 4;30(8). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf100.
2
Germline mutation analysis and postoperative recurrence risk prediction in breast cancer patients from western China.中国西部乳腺癌患者的生殖系突变分析及术后复发风险预测
Transl Oncol. 2025 Jul 29;60:102477. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102477.
3
Development and evaluation of a Tc-labeled olaparib analog for PARP imaging.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic and clinical characterization of BRCA-associated hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Navarra (Spain).西班牙纳瓦拉地区 BRCA 相关性遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的遗传和临床特征。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):1145. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6277-x.
2
Clinical Trials Focusing on Drug Control and Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.聚焦于药物控制与预防呼吸机相关性肺炎的临床试验:对ClinicalTrials.gov上注册试验的综合分析
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 26;9:1574. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01574. eCollection 2018.
3
Prevalence and clinical outcomes of germline mutations in BRCA1/2 and PALB2 genes in 2769 unselected breast cancer patients in China.
用于PARP成像的锝标记奥拉帕利类似物的研发与评估
EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2025 Jul 22;10(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41181-025-00373-4.
4
Timely germline BRCA testing after invasive breast cancer promotes contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy and improves survival: an observational retrospective study.浸润性乳腺癌后及时进行种系BRCA检测可促进对侧预防性乳房切除术并提高生存率:一项观察性回顾性研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07726-2.
5
Recent advancements in nanomaterial-based biosensors for diagnosis of breast cancer: a comprehensive review.基于纳米材料的乳腺癌诊断生物传感器的最新进展:综述
Cancer Cell Int. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12935-025-03663-8.
6
Bibliometric analysis of olaparib and pancreatic cancer from 2009 to 2022: A global perspective.2009年至2022年奥拉帕利与胰腺癌的文献计量分析:全球视角
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):4489-4505. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4489.
7
BRCA-mutated breast cancer: the unmet need, challenges and therapeutic benefits of genetic testing.BRCA 突变型乳腺癌:基因检测的未满足需求、挑战和治疗获益。
Br J Cancer. 2024 Nov;131(9):1400-1414. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02827-z. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
8
Effects of Endocrine Interventions Targeting ERα or PR on Breast Cancer Risk in the General Population and Carriers of Pathogenic Variants.针对 ERα 或 PR 的内分泌干预对普通人群和致病性变异携带者乳腺癌风险的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 28;25(11):5894. doi: 10.3390/ijms25115894.
9
Survival Outcomes and Efficacy of Platinum in Early Breast Cancer Patients with Germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.铂类药物对携带种系BRCA1或BRCA2突变的早期乳腺癌患者的生存结局及疗效:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023 Sep 4;15:671-682. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S423330. eCollection 2023.
10
Targeting Breast Cancer: An Overlook on Current Strategies.靶向乳腺癌:当前策略概述
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 11;24(4):3643. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043643.
在中国 2769 例未经选择的乳腺癌患者中,BRCA1/2 和 PALB2 基因种系突变的流行率和临床结局。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Sep 15;145(6):1517-1528. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32184. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
4
mutation in breast cancer patients: Analysis of prognostic factors and survival.乳腺癌患者的突变:预后因素与生存分析
Oncol Lett. 2019 Feb;17(2):1986-1995. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9770. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
5
Beyond 5 years: enduring risk of recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.5 年以上:雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的持续复发风险。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 May;16(5):296-311. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0145-5.
6
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
7
New Guidelines Allow Some Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia To Go Off Treatment.新指南允许部分慢性髓性白血病患者停止治疗。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Jul 1;109(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx154.
8
Germline breast cancer susceptibility gene mutations and breast cancer outcomes.胚系乳腺癌易感性基因突变与乳腺癌结局。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 22;18(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4229-5.
9
Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study.胚系 BRCA 突变与早发性乳腺癌(POSH)的结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-180. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30891-4. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
10
Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer Due to Mutations Other Than BRCA1 and BRCA2 Founder Alleles Among Ashkenazi Jewish Women.非 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 种系突变导致的阿什肯纳兹犹太裔妇女乳腺癌遗传易感性。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1647-1653. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1996.