Hecht Lars, Meyer Gabriele, Steckelberg Anke
School of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Herdecke, Germany.
Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 9;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02519-9.
Diabetes associations claim to have a patient-centered approach in diabetes care including shared decision-making (SDM). Diabetes educators are important healthcare professionals for implementing the concept of informed SDM in diabetes care. They need critical health competences (CHC) in order to provide evidence-based information and to support patients in understanding the risks of the disease and also the possible benefits or harm of the healthcare options. Therefore, we surveyed the CHC of diabetes educators.
We performed a cross-sectional survey using the validated Critical Health Competences (CHC) Test to measure CHC of certified diabetes educators and trainees in Germany. Diabetes educators were approached via newsletter, mailing lists or in person during the conference of the German Diabetes Association. Trainees were approached during their training sessions. We applied scenario 1 of the CHC test, which comprises 17 items with open-ended and multiple-choice questions. Mean person parameters with a range from 0 to 1000 were calculated to assess the levels of critical health competences and a multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine correlations between sociodemographic variables and levels of CHC.
A total of 325 participants, mean age 38.6 (±11.1) years, completed the CHC test; n = 174 (55.5%) were certified diabetes educators and n = 151 (46.5%) were trainees. The participants achieved a mean score of 409.84 person parameters (±88.10) (scale from 0 to 1000). A statistically significant association was found only between the level of education and the level of CHC (b = 0.221; p-value 0.002). Participants with grammar school education achieved higher mean scores compared to participants with secondary school education (432.88 ± 77.72 vs. 396.45 ± 85.95; mean difference 36.42 ± 9.29; 95%CI 18.15 to 54.71; p < 0.0001).
Diabetes educators achieved low competence scores and it can be assumed that they do not have sufficient CHC to conduct consultations based on the SDM principles. Poor CHC among healthcare providers are a major barrier for the implementation of SDM. Core concepts of evidence-based medicine should be implemented into the curricula for diabetes educators in order to increase their levels of CHC.
糖尿病协会宣称在糖尿病护理中采用以患者为中心的方法,包括共同决策(SDM)。糖尿病教育工作者是在糖尿病护理中实施明智的共同决策概念的重要医疗保健专业人员。他们需要关键健康能力(CHC),以便提供循证信息,并支持患者理解疾病风险以及医疗保健选择可能带来的益处或危害。因此,我们对糖尿病教育工作者的关键健康能力进行了调查。
我们使用经过验证的关键健康能力(CHC)测试进行了一项横断面调查,以测量德国认证糖尿病教育工作者和学员的关键健康能力。通过时事通讯、邮件列表或在德国糖尿病协会会议期间亲自联系糖尿病教育工作者。在培训期间联系学员。我们应用了CHC测试的情景1,其中包括17个开放式和多项选择题。计算了范围从0到1000的平均个人参数,以评估关键健康能力水平,并进行了多元线性回归分析,以确定社会人口统计学变量与关键健康能力水平之间的相关性。
共有345名参与者(平均年龄38.6(±11.1)岁)完成了CHC测试;n = 174(55.5%)为认证糖尿病教育工作者,n = 151(46.5%)为学员。参与者的平均得分是409.84个人参数(±88.10)(范围从0到1000)。仅在教育水平与关键健康能力水平之间发现了统计学上的显著关联(b = 0.221;p值0.002)。与接受中学教育的参与者相比,接受文法学校教育的参与者获得了更高的平均得分(432.88±77.72对396.45±85.95;平均差异36.42±9.29;95%CI 18.15至54.71;p < 0.0001)。
糖尿病教育工作者的能力得分较低,可以假设他们没有足够的关键健康能力来基于共同决策原则进行咨询。医疗保健提供者的关键健康能力较差是实施共同决策的主要障碍。循证医学的核心概念应纳入糖尿病教育工作者的课程中,以提高他们的关键健康能力水平。