Suppr超能文献

新鲜体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中单枚桑葚胚移植与单枚囊胚移植的妊娠结局比较。

Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Single-Morula Embryo Transfer and Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles.

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2021 Feb 10;27:e928737. doi: 10.12659/MSM.928737.

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study investigated the effectiveness and feasibility of day 4 (D4) morula embryo transfer (ET) in comparison with day 5 (D5) blastocyst ET, with regards to their clinical data, laboratory test results, and pregnancy outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study enrolled 1070 patients, including 178 cases in group D4 and 892 cases in group D5. The endpoint was live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes of D4 embryos with different morphology were compared and assigned to 3 groups: in group 1 (n=66) the embryos were compacted but not expanded, in group 2 (n=102) the embryos were compacted and expanded (early blastocyst), and in group 3 (n=10) the embryos were not compacted. RESULTS Groups D4 and D5 had comparable clinical pregnancy rates (53.37% vs. 59.97%) and live birth rates (43.25% vs 50.89%), and there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. In group 3, there was only 1 clinical pregnancy and no live birth. In comparison between group 1 and group 2, the clinical pregnancy rate of group 2 showed an upward trend (48.48% vs 60.78%), but there was no significant difference. There was also no statistically significant difference in the live birth rate between the 2 groups (42.42% vs 49.01%). CONCLUSIONS Transferring of compacted embryos or early blastocysts can result in high clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates. In addition to the cleavage and blastocyst ET, morula ET may serve as an alternative option for the clinician.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较第 4 天(D4)桑椹胚与第 5 天(D5)囊胚移植的有效性和可行性,主要比较两组的临床资料、实验室检查结果和妊娠结局。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了 1070 例患者,其中 D4 组 178 例,D5 组 892 例。研究的终点为新鲜胚胎移植后的活产率。此外,还比较了不同形态 D4 胚胎的临床结局,并将其分为 3 组:第 1 组(n=66)的胚胎致密但未扩张,第 2 组(n=102)的胚胎致密且扩张(早期囊胚),第 3 组(n=10)的胚胎未致密。

结果

D4 组和 D5 组的临床妊娠率(53.37% vs. 59.97%)和活产率(43.25% vs. 50.89%)相当,两组间无显著差异。第 3 组仅 1 例临床妊娠,无活产。与第 1 组相比,第 2 组的临床妊娠率呈上升趋势(48.48% vs. 60.78%),但差异无统计学意义。两组的活产率也无统计学差异(42.42% vs. 49.01%)。

结论

移植致密胚胎或早期囊胚可获得较高的临床妊娠率和活产率。除了卵裂期和囊胚期胚胎移植外,桑椹胚移植也可作为临床医生的另一种选择。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Effects and safety of propofol intravenous anesthesia in transvaginal oocyte retrieval on outcomes of fertilization and embryo transplantation.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 16;15:1497948. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1497948. eCollection 2024.
4
Which transfer day results in the highest live birth rate for PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Dec 16;23(1):865. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06173-5.
5
Impact of Post-Thaw Incubation Time of Frozen Embryos on Clinical Pregnancy Rate.
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2023 Jan-Mar;16(1):64-69. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_180_22.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of blastocyst transfer on newborn sex ratio and monozygotic twinning rate: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Sep;37(3):292-303. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
4
No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Mar;35(3):457-465. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1092-2. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
5
Propensity score-matched study and meta-analysis of cumulative outcomes of day 2/3 versus day 5/6 embryo transfers.
Front Med. 2017 Dec;11(4):563-569. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0535-6. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
6
Pregnancy rates of day 4 and day 5 embryos after culture in an integrated time-lapse incubator.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017 May 8;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12958-017-0253-6.
7
Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;49(5):583-591. doi: 10.1002/uog.17327. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
9
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5.
10
Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Feb;32(2):142-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.09.016. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验