Oesophageal Physiology Laboratory, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Digestive Function: Basel, Laboratory and Clinic for Motility Disorders and Functional Digestive Diseases, Center for Integrative Gastroenterology, Klinik Arlesheim, Arlesheim, Switzerland.
Gut. 2021 Dec;70(12):2230-2237. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323798. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
Acid exposure time (AET) from ambulatory pH studies and reflux oesophagitis are independent measurements used by the Lyon classification to diagnose GORD. This study aimed to validate AET reference ranges and diagnostic thresholds by analysis of 96-hour wireless pH studies from healthy, asymptomatic controls (HCs) and patients with and without oesophagitis.
HC and consecutive patients referred for wireless pH studies (off acid suppressants for >7 days) underwent 96-hour pH studies at two tertiary referral centres. Erosive oesophagitis was categorised by the Los Angeles (LA) classification. Linear regression and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis were performed to define optimal diagnostic cut-offs.
Prolonged, 96-hour pH studies were completed in 39 HCs (age 28 (18-53) years, 72% female) and 944 patients (age 46 (16-85) years, 65% female), of whom 136 (14.5%) had reflux oesophagitis. Median AET in HC was 1.3% (upper 95th percentile 4.6%) for any study day and 2.6% (upper 95th percentile 6.9%) for the worst day (24-hour period) during the study. ROC analysis for average AET differentiated HC from patients with moderate-to-severe oesophagitis (LA BCD; sensitivity 87%, specificity 95%, positive predictive value (PPV) 59%, negative predictive value 99% for a cut-off AET of 4.3%; area under the receiver operating curve 0.95). Specificity was higher, but PPV was substantially lower for severe oesophagitis (LA CD). 'Worst-day' analysis provided similar results; however, day-to-day variability was high.
Diagnostic thresholds for average AET were identified that accurately discriminate between HCs and patients with erosive oesophagitis. The findings provide conditional support for diagnostic criteria for GORD proposed by the Lyon Consensus.
动态 pH 研究中的酸暴露时间 (AET) 和反流性食管炎是 Lyon 分类用于诊断 GORD 的独立测量指标。本研究旨在通过分析健康无症状对照者(HC)和有无食管炎的患者的 96 小时无线 pH 研究,验证 AET 参考范围和诊断阈值。
HC 和连续因无线 pH 研究(停用抑酸剂 >7 天)而转诊的患者在两个三级转诊中心进行 96 小时 pH 研究。洛杉矶(LA)分类对糜烂性食管炎进行分类。进行线性回归和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析,以确定最佳诊断截断值。
39 名 HC(年龄 28(18-53)岁,72%为女性)和 944 名患者(年龄 46(16-85)岁,65%为女性)完成了延长的 96 小时 pH 研究,其中 136 名(14.5%)患有反流性食管炎。HC 的中位 AET 在任何研究日为 1.3%(上 95%百分位数为 4.6%),在研究期间最差日(24 小时)为 2.6%(上 95%百分位数为 6.9%)。平均 AET 的 ROC 分析可区分 HC 与中重度食管炎患者(LA BCD;敏感性 87%,特异性 95%,阳性预测值(PPV)59%,阴性预测值 99%,截断值 AET 为 4.3%;ROC 曲线下面积 0.95)。对于严重食管炎(LA CD),特异性更高,但 PPV 大大降低。“最差日”分析提供了类似的结果;然而,每日的变异性较高。
确定了平均 AET 的诊断阈值,可准确区分 HC 和糜烂性食管炎患者。这些发现为 Lyon 共识提出的 GORD 诊断标准提供了有条件的支持。