• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
When do Online Audiences Amplify Benefits of Self-Disclosure? The Role of Shared Experience and Anticipated Interactivity.在线受众何时会放大自我表露的益处?共享体验和预期互动的作用。
J Broadcast Electron Media. 2020;64(2):277-297. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2020.1757366. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Psychological Antecedents and Consequences of Social Integration Based on Self-Disclosure in Virtual Communities: Empirical Evidence From Sina Microblog.基于新浪微博自我表露的虚拟社区社会融合的心理前因及后果:实证证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 16;13:829327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.829327. eCollection 2022.
3
Stepping back to move forward: Expressive writing promotes self-distancing.以退为进:表达性写作促进自我疏离。
Emotion. 2016 Apr;16(3):349-64. doi: 10.1037/emo0000121. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
4
Expressive writing for gay-related stress: psychosocial benefits and mechanisms underlying improvement.表达性写作对同性恋相关压力的影响:改善的心理社会获益及作用机制
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Feb;78(1):98-110. doi: 10.1037/a0017580.
5
Enhancing the benefits of written emotional disclosure through response training.通过回应训练增强书面情感披露的益处。
Behav Ther. 2014 May;45(3):344-57. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.12.006. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
6
Acculturation Moderates the Effects of Expressive Writing on Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms Among Chinese American Breast Cancer Survivors.文化适应调节了表达性写作对华裔美国乳腺癌幸存者创伤后应激症状的影响。
Int J Behav Med. 2019 Apr;26(2):185-194. doi: 10.1007/s12529-019-09769-4.
7
Healing the wounds of organizational injustice: examining the benefits of expressive writing.治愈组织不公正的创伤:审视表达性写作的益处。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):511-23. doi: 10.1037/a0013451.
8
Written Emotional Disclosure: Testing Whether Social Disclosure Matters.书面情感表露:检验社交表露是否重要。
J Soc Clin Psychol. 2010 May 1;26(3):362-384. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.3.362.
9
Exploring the process of writing about and sharing traumatic birth experiences online.探索在线撰写和分享创伤性分娩经历的过程。
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 May;20(2):243-60. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12093. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
10
Expressive writing among Chinese American breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial.华裔美国乳腺癌幸存者的表达性写作:一项随机对照试验。
Health Psychol. 2017 Apr;36(4):370-379. doi: 10.1037/hea0000449. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Between support and strain: How do the illness narratives of patients with mental issues articulate the affordances of smartphones?在支持与压力之间:精神问题患者的疾病叙事如何阐明智能手机的功能?
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 20;11:20552076251360882. doi: 10.1177/20552076251360882. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Effects of expressive helping writing during stem cell transplant: Randomized controlled trial.干细胞移植期间表达性帮助写作的效果:随机对照试验。
Health Psychol. 2025 Apr;44(4):345-356. doi: 10.1037/hea0001445. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3
Using Machine Learning of Online Expression to Explain Recovery Trajectories: Content Analytic Approach to Studying a Substance Use Disorder Forum.利用在线表达的机器学习来解释恢复轨迹:研究物质使用障碍论坛的内容分析方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 22;25:e45589. doi: 10.2196/45589.
4
Meeting Young Adults' Social Support Needs across the Health Behavior Change Journey: Implications for Digital Mental Health Tools.在健康行为改变之旅中满足年轻人的社会支持需求:对数字心理健康工具的启示
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2022 Nov;6(CSCW2). doi: 10.1145/3555203. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
5
Intraindividual, Dyadic, and Network Communication in a Digital Health Intervention: Distinguishing Message Exposure from Message Production.个体内、对偶和网络通讯在数字健康干预中的作用:区分信息暴露和信息生成。
Health Commun. 2022 Apr;37(4):397-408. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1846273. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients.在线支持群组中的社交网络:在线社交网络如何使患者受益。
J Health Commun. 2014;19(6):639-59. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.757396. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
2
Facebook surveillance of former romantic partners: associations with postbreakup recovery and personal growth.脸书对前任伴侣的监控:与分手后的恢复和个人成长的关联。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Oct;15(10):521-6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0125. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
3
An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior.同群现象在健康行为采用中的实验研究。
Science. 2011 Dec 2;334(6060):1269-72. doi: 10.1126/science.1207055.
4
Experimental manipulations of perspective taking and perspective switching in expressive writing.在表达性写作中对观点采择和观点转换的实验操作。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Aug;25(5):926-38. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.512123. Epub 2011 May 24.
5
Membership and boundary maintenance on an online self-harm forum.在线自我伤害论坛的会员资格和边界维护。
Qual Health Res. 2011 Nov;21(11):1567-75. doi: 10.1177/1049732311413784. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
6
Written Emotional Disclosure: Testing Whether Social Disclosure Matters.书面情感表露:检验社交表露是否重要。
J Soc Clin Psychol. 2010 May 1;26(3):362-384. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.3.362.
7
Breakup distress in university students.大学生的分手痛苦
Adolescence. 2009 Winter;44(176):705-27.
8
Who am I without you? The influence of romantic breakup on the self-concept.没有你我是谁?浪漫分手对自我概念的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Feb;36(2):147-60. doi: 10.1177/0146167209352250. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
9
A short form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory.创伤后成长量表简表。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2010;23(2):127-37. doi: 10.1080/10615800903094273.
10
Exploring the boundary conditions of expressive writing: In search of the right recipe.探索表达性写作的边界条件:寻找正确的方法。
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Feb;13(Pt 1):1-7. doi: 10.1348/135910707X260117.

在线受众何时会放大自我表露的益处?共享体验和预期互动的作用。

When do Online Audiences Amplify Benefits of Self-Disclosure? The Role of Shared Experience and Anticipated Interactivity.

作者信息

Kornfield Rachel F, Toma Catalina L

机构信息

Northwestern University.

University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

J Broadcast Electron Media. 2020;64(2):277-297. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2020.1757366. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1080/08838151.2020.1757366
PMID:33584002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7879999/
Abstract

As individuals increasingly write about their distressing experiences online, it is important to understand how perceived online audiences influence the effects of self-disclosure. In an experiment, participants wrote about recent breakups for online audiences purportedly varying in 1) whether they shared recent breakup experiences and 2) their ability to leave comments. Participants perceiving audiences with shared experience showed more cognitive processing in their writing and reported increased post-traumatic growth at follow-up than participants perceiving general audiences. Those anticipating comments wrote less about emotions than those who did not. Mechanisms accounting for the benefits of shared experience warrant further investigation.

摘要

随着个人越来越多地在网上写下他们的痛苦经历,了解感知到的网络受众如何影响自我表露的效果就显得很重要。在一项实验中,参与者针对网络受众写下最近的分手经历,这些受众据称在以下两方面存在差异:1)他们是否分享过最近的分手经历;2)他们发表评论的能力。与那些认为受众是普通大众的参与者相比,那些认为受众有共同经历的参与者在写作中表现出更多的认知加工,并且在随访时报告的创伤后成长有所增加。那些预期会收到评论的参与者比那些没有这种预期的参与者更少书写情感内容。解释共同经历益处的机制值得进一步研究。