• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检查淋巴结数量在胃腺癌根治性切除术中准确分期及提高生存率方面的重要性——越多越好?一项对2010 - 2016年来自美国和中国的8696例病例的队列研究

Importance of Examined Lymph Node Number in Accurate Staging and Enhanced Survival in Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma-The More, the Better? A Cohort Study of 8,696 Cases From the US and China, 2010-2016.

作者信息

Huang Lei, Zhang Xinyue, Wei Zhijian, Xu Aman

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Department of Academic Research, Hefei City First People's Hospital, Hefei, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 6;10:539030. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.539030. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.539030
PMID:33585181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7874152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While most guidelines advocate D2 lymphadenectomy for non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (nmGaC), it is not always performed as standard of care outside East Asia. The recommended minimal examined lymph node (ELN) count in nmGaC to stage cancer accurately varies largely across guidelines, and the optimal count to satisfactorily stratify patient survival has yet to be determined. This large cohort study aimed at robustly defining the minimal and optimal thresholds of examined lymph node (ELN) number in non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (nmGaC).

METHODS

Data on nmGaC patients operated in 2010-2016 and surviving ≥3 months were retrieved from the US SEER-18 Program and a Chinese multi-institutional gastric cancer database (MIGC). The correlation of ELN count with stage migration and patient survival were quantified with the use of the multivariable-adjusted logistic and proportional hazards Cox models, respectively. The sequences of odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) for each additional ELN were smoothed, and the structural breakpoints were determined.

RESULTS

Together 7,228 patients from the US and 1,468 from China were analyzed, encompassing 23,114 person-years of follow-up. The mean ELN count was 20 in the US and 30 in China. With more ELNs, both cohorts significantly showed proportional increases from lower to higher nodal stage (OR = 1.03, 95%-CI = 1.03-1.04; OR = 1.02, 95%-CI = 1.02-1.03) and sequential enhancements in postoperative survival (HR = 0.97, 95%-CI = 0.97-0.97; HR = 0.98, 95%-CI = 0.97-0.99). Correlations for both stage migration and survival were still significant in most subgroups by patient, cancer, and management factors. Breakpoint analyses revealed a minimum threshold ELN count of 17 and an optimum count of 33, which were validated in both cohorts with good efficacy to differentiate probabilities of both stage migration and survival.

CONCLUSION

In resected nmGaC patients with anticipated survival ≥3 months, more ELNs are correlated with more accurate staging, which may partly explain the survival correlation. This observational investigation does not indicate causality. Our findings robustly conclude 17 ELNs as the minimum and propose 33 ELNs as the optimum thresholds, to assess the quality of lymph node examination and to stratify postsurgical survival.

摘要

背景

虽然大多数指南提倡对非转移性胃腺癌(nmGaC)行D2淋巴结清扫术,但在东亚以外地区,这并不总是作为标准治疗方案实施。nmGaC中为准确分期而推荐的最小检查淋巴结(ELN)数量在不同指南中差异很大,而能令人满意地对患者生存进行分层的最佳数量尚未确定。这项大型队列研究旨在明确非转移性胃腺癌(nmGaC)中检查淋巴结(ELN)数量的最小和最佳阈值。

方法

从美国SEER-18计划和一个中国多机构胃癌数据库(MIGC)中检索2010年至2016年接受手术且存活≥3个月的nmGaC患者的数据。分别使用多变量调整的逻辑回归模型和比例风险Cox模型量化ELN数量与分期迁移和患者生存的相关性。对每增加一个ELN的优势比(OR)和风险比(HR)序列进行平滑处理,并确定结构断点。

结果

共分析了来自美国的7228例患者和来自中国的1468例患者,随访时间共计23114人年。美国患者的平均ELN数量为20个,中国患者为30个。ELN数量越多,两个队列均显著显示从较低到较高淋巴结分期呈比例增加(OR = 1.03,95%置信区间 = 1.03 - 1.04;OR = 1.02,95%置信区间 = 1.02 - 1.03)以及术后生存率持续提高(HR = 0.97,95%置信区间 = 0.97 - 0.97;HR = 0.98,95%置信区间 = 0.97 - 0.99)。按患者、癌症和管理因素划分的大多数亚组中,分期迁移和生存的相关性仍然显著。断点分析显示ELN数量的最小阈值为17个,最佳数量为33个,这在两个队列中均得到验证,对区分分期迁移和生存概率具有良好效果。

结论

在预期生存≥3个月的接受手术的nmGaC患者中,更多的ELN与更准确的分期相关,这可能部分解释了生存相关性。这项观察性研究并未表明因果关系。我们的研究结果有力地得出结论,17个ELN为最小阈值,并建议33个ELN为最佳阈值,以评估淋巴结检查质量和对术后生存进行分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41f/7874152/0b6814bb1b31/fonc-10-539030-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41f/7874152/4f9b9ae9e61d/fonc-10-539030-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41f/7874152/9a31b98589d2/fonc-10-539030-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41f/7874152/0b6814bb1b31/fonc-10-539030-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41f/7874152/4f9b9ae9e61d/fonc-10-539030-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41f/7874152/9a31b98589d2/fonc-10-539030-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41f/7874152/0b6814bb1b31/fonc-10-539030-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Importance of Examined Lymph Node Number in Accurate Staging and Enhanced Survival in Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma-The More, the Better? A Cohort Study of 8,696 Cases From the US and China, 2010-2016.检查淋巴结数量在胃腺癌根治性切除术中准确分期及提高生存率方面的重要性——越多越好?一项对2010 - 2016年来自美国和中国的8696例病例的队列研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 6;10:539030. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.539030. eCollection 2020.
2
Significance of Examined Lymph Node Number in Accurate Staging and Long-term Survival in Resected Stage I-II Pancreatic Cancer-More is Better? A Large International Population-based Cohort Study.在根治性切除的 I 期- II 期胰腺癌中,检查淋巴结数量对准确分期和长期生存的意义——更多更好?一项大型国际基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e554-e563. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003558.
3
Impact of examined lymph node number on accurate nodal staging and long-term survival of resected Siewert type II-III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A large population-based study.检查淋巴结数量对食管胃交界部Siewert II-III型腺癌切除术后准确淋巴结分期及长期生存的影响:一项基于大人群的研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 31;12:979338. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.979338. eCollection 2022.
4
Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study.直肠癌准确分期和长期生存的最佳检查淋巴结数:一项基于人群的研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Aug 1;109(8):2241-2248. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000320.
5
Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count on Precise Staging and Long-Term Survival of Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Population Study of the US SEER Database and a Chinese Multi-Institutional Registry.检查的淋巴结数量对切除的非小细胞肺癌精确分期及长期生存的影响:一项基于美国监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库及中国多机构登记处的人群研究
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 10;35(11):1162-1170. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.5140. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
6
Impact of examined lymph node count on staging and long-term survival of patients with node-negative stage III gastric cancer: a retrospective study using a Chinese multi-institutional registry with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data validation.检查的淋巴结数量对Ⅲ期淋巴结阴性胃癌患者分期及长期生存的影响:一项使用中国多机构登记数据并经监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据验证的回顾性研究
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Sep;8(17):1075. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1358a.
7
Significance of examined lymph-node count in accurate staging and long-term survival in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a population-based study.在接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者中,检查的淋巴结计数对准确分期和长期生存的意义:一项基于人群的研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Feb;52(2):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02300-4. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Impact of examined lymph node number on lymph node status and prognosis in FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based study.检查淋巴结数量对国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IB-IIA期宫颈鳞状细胞癌淋巴结状态及预后的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;12:994105. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.994105. eCollection 2022.
9
Determining the Adequate Examined Lymph Node Count in Resected Ampullary Adenocarcinoma-A National Cohort Study.确定切除的壶腹腺癌中适当的检查淋巴结数量-全国队列研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 May;22(5):792-801. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3737-6. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Prognostic Impact of the Number of Examined Lymph Nodes in Stage II Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Study.II期结直肠癌中检查淋巴结数量的预后影响:一项回顾性研究
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020 Jun 24;2020:8065972. doi: 10.1155/2020/8065972. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining more than 35 lymph nodes improves the staging and survival in resectable advanced gastric cancer: a multi-institutional study in China.检查超过35个淋巴结可改善可切除进展期胃癌的分期及生存率:一项中国多机构研究
Surg Today. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03053-7.
2
Prognostic performance of examined lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and positive lymph nodes in gastric cancer: a competing risk model study.胃癌中检查淋巴结、淋巴结比率及阳性淋巴结的预后性能:一项竞争风险模型研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 21;16:1434999. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1434999. eCollection 2025.
3
Targeted therapy and immunotherapy for gastric cancer: rational strategies, novel advancements, challenges, and future perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
Decreasing resection rates for nonmetastatic gastric cancer in Europe and the United States.欧美地区非转移性胃癌的切除率正在下降。
Clin Transl Med. 2020 Oct;10(6):e203. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.203.
2
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.食管和胃食管交界处癌,2019 年第 2 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):855-883. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033.
3
Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2018: an Evidence-based, Multi-disciplinary Approach.
胃癌的靶向治疗与免疫治疗:合理策略、新进展、挑战及未来展望
Mol Med. 2025 Feb 8;31(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s10020-025-01075-y.
4
Prognostic value of a modified pathological staging system for gastric cancer based on the number of retrieved lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio.基于淋巴结检出数和转移淋巴结比例的改良胃癌病理分期系统的预后价值。
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 1;12:e18165. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18165. eCollection 2024.
5
1657 Resected Gastric Adenocarcinomas at a Single Institution: Outcomes and Trends over 17 Years.一家单中心 17 年 1657 例胃腺癌切除术的结果和趋势。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):7142-7156. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15842-4. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Nanoparticle-Labeled Lymph Node Dissection in Radical Resection of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.碳纳米粒子标记的淋巴结清扫术在胃癌根治性切除术中的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15330338231154094. doi: 10.1177/15330338231154094.
7
Survival Outcome of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on the Optimal Number of Examined Lymph Nodes: A Nomogram- and Machine-Learning-Based Approach.基于最佳检查淋巴结数量的胃印戒细胞癌生存结果:一种基于列线图和机器学习的方法
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 1;12(3):1160. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031160.
8
Continuous care needs in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy during the recent omicron wave of COVID-19 in Shanghai: A qualitative study.上海新冠疫情奥密克戎毒株流行期间接受化疗的癌症患者的持续护理需求:一项定性研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1067238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067238. eCollection 2022.
9
Impact of examined lymph node number on accurate nodal staging and long-term survival of resected Siewert type II-III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A large population-based study.检查淋巴结数量对食管胃交界部Siewert II-III型腺癌切除术后准确淋巴结分期及长期生存的影响:一项基于大人群的研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 31;12:979338. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.979338. eCollection 2022.
10
Brain metastasis from gastric adenocarcinoma: A large comprehensive population-based cohort study on risk factors and prognosis.胃腺癌脑转移:一项基于大规模综合人群队列的危险因素及预后研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 18;12:897681. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.897681. eCollection 2022.
《2018年韩国胃癌诊疗指南:基于证据的多学科方法》
J Gastric Cancer. 2019 Mar;19(1):1-48. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e8. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
4
The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer.中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO):胃癌诊断与治疗临床实践指南。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 Mar 18;39(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0349-9.
5
Number of retrieved lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after total gastrectomy for patients with stage III gastric cancer: propensity score matching analysis of a multi-institution dataset.淋巴结清扫数目是 III 期胃癌全胃切除术后的独立预后因素:多中心数据集倾向评分匹配分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jul;22(4):853-863. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0902-2. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
7
Gastric cancer: French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO).胃癌:法国胃肠肿瘤学会临床实践指南——诊断、治疗和随访(SNFGE、FFCD、GERCOR、UNICANCER、SFCD、SFED、SFRO)。
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Aug;50(8):768-779. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.04.025. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
8
Effect of total number of harvested lymph nodes on survival outcomes after curative resection for gastric adenocarcinoma: findings from an eastern high-volume gastric cancer center.胃腺癌根治性切除术后采集的淋巴结总数对生存结局的影响:来自东部大容量胃癌中心的研究结果。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 12;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3872-6.
9
Staging and surgical approaches in gastric cancer: a clinical practice guideline.胃癌的分期与手术方法:临床实践指南
Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):324-331. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3736. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
10
Increasing the Number of Examined Lymph Nodes is a Prerequisite for Improvement in the Accurate Evaluation of Overall Survival of Node-Negative Gastric Cancer Patients.增加检查淋巴结的数量是提高对无淋巴结转移胃癌患者总生存准确评估的前提条件。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar;24(3):745-753. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5513-8. Epub 2016 Oct 21.