Zhong Zhiwei, Li Xiaofei, Sanders Dirk, Liu Yiming, Wang Ling, Ortega Yvette K, Pearson Dean E, Wang Deli
Institute of Grassland Science, Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education/Jilin Songnen Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
College of Resources and Environmental Sciences/Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Soil Resources in the Commodity Grain Bases in Jilin Province, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, China.
Ecology. 2021 May;102(5):e03312. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3312. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
The interplay between top-down and bottom-up processes determines ecosystem productivity. Yet, the factors that mediate the balance between these opposing forces remain poorly understood. Furthering this challenge, complex and often cryptic factors like ecosystem engineering and trait-mediated interactions may play major roles in mediating the outcomes of top-down and bottom-up interactions. In semiarid grasslands of northeastern China, we conducted a large-scale, three-year experiment to evaluate how soil engineering by ants and plasticity in plants independently and jointly influenced the top-down effects of grazing by a ubiquitous herbivore (cattle) on aboveground standing biomass of the dominant perennial grass, Leymus chinensis. Herbivory had strong top-down effects, reducing L. chinensis AB by 25% relative to baseline levels without cattle or ants. In contrast, soil engineering by ants facilitated weak bottom-up effects in the absence of herbivory. However, in the presence of herbivory, soil engineering effects were strong enough to fully offset herbivore removal of aboveground biomass. This outcome was mediated by L. chinensis's plasticity in reallocating growth from below- to aboveground biomass, a result linked to additive effects of engineers and herbivores increasing soil N availability and engineering effects improving soil structure. Soil engineering increased soil N by 12%, promoting aboveground biomass. Herbivores increased soil N by 13% via defecation, but this increase failed to offset their reductions in aboveground biomass in isolation. However, when combined, engineers and herbivores increased soil N by 26% and engineers improved soil bulk density, facilitating L. chinensis to shift resource allocations from below- to aboveground biomass sufficiently to fully offset herbivore suppression of aboveground biomass. Our results demonstrate that soil engineering and trait-mediated effects of plant plasticity can strongly mediate the outcome of top-down and bottom-up interactions. These cryptic but perhaps ubiquitous processes may help to explain the long-debated phenomenon of plant compensatory responses to large grazers.
自上而下和自下而上的过程之间的相互作用决定了生态系统的生产力。然而,调节这些相反力量之间平衡的因素仍知之甚少。更具挑战性的是,诸如生态系统工程和性状介导的相互作用等复杂且往往难以捉摸的因素,可能在调节自上而下和自下而上相互作用的结果中发挥主要作用。在中国东北的半干旱草原,我们进行了一项为期三年的大规模实验,以评估蚂蚁的土壤工程作用以及植物的可塑性如何独立和共同影响一种常见食草动物(牛)的放牧对优势多年生草本植物羊草地上现存生物量的自上而下效应。食草作用具有强烈的自上而下效应,相对于没有牛或蚂蚁的基线水平,羊草的地上生物量减少了25%。相比之下,在没有食草作用的情况下,蚂蚁的土壤工程作用促进了微弱的自下而上效应。然而,在有食草作用的情况下,土壤工程作用强大到足以完全抵消食草动物对地上生物量的去除。这一结果是由羊草在将生长从地下生物量重新分配到地上生物量方面的可塑性介导的,这一结果与工程生物和食草动物增加土壤氮有效性的累加效应以及工程作用改善土壤结构有关。土壤工程使土壤氮增加了12%,促进了地上生物量。食草动物通过排便使土壤氮增加了13%,但这种增加单独来看未能抵消它们对地上生物量的减少。然而,当两者结合时,工程生物和食草动物使土壤氮增加了26%,并且工程生物改善了土壤容重,促使羊草将资源分配从地下生物量充分转移到地上生物量,从而完全抵消食草动物对地上生物量的抑制。我们的结果表明,土壤工程和植物可塑性的性状介导效应可以强烈调节自上而下和自下而上相互作用的结果。这些难以捉摸但可能普遍存在的过程,或许有助于解释长期以来备受争议的植物对大型食草动物的补偿反应现象。