Université de Nantes, Laboratoire CEISAM, UMR 6230 CNRS, 44322 Nantes, France.
Normandie Université, INSA Rouen, UNIROUEN, CNRS, COBRA, 76000 Rouen, France.
J Org Chem. 2021 Mar 5;86(5):4143-4158. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c02964. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
A variety of physicochemical properties and several hydrogen-bond donors have been used to define methods and to build scales aiming at measuring the hydrogen-bond acceptance of solvents. There is a great deal of confusion in these scales and methods. Solvatochromic, solvatocalorimetric, solvatovibrational, and F solvatomagnetic comparison methods are critically reviewed. Only two methods, the solvatomagnetic and the solvatocalorimetric ones, are able to yield reliable solvent hydrogen-bond acceptance scales. The solvatomagnetic β scale defined from the F chemical shift of 4-fluorophenol is extended to many solvents including ionic liquids and green solvents. The results for about 240 hydrogen-bond acceptor solvents are organized in a numerical β database. The comparison of β with solvatochromic scales highlights their shortcomings, in particular for the important class of amphiprotic solvents. Therefore, the use of the F solvatomagnetic comparison method and of the solvatomagnetic β scale is recommended in solvent effect studies.
各种物理化学性质和几个氢键供体已被用于定义方法和构建旨在测量溶剂氢键接受能力的标度。这些标度和方法存在很大的混淆。本文批判性地回顾了溶剂变色、溶剂热化学、溶剂振动和 F 溶剂磁比较方法。只有两种方法,即溶剂磁和溶剂热化学方法,能够产生可靠的溶剂氢键接受标度。从 4-氟苯酚的 F 化学位移定义的溶剂磁β标度扩展到包括离子液体和绿色溶剂在内的许多溶剂。大约 240 种氢键受体溶剂的结果被组织在一个数值β数据库中。β与溶剂变色标度的比较突出了它们的缺点,特别是对于两性溶剂这一重要类别。因此,建议在溶剂效应研究中使用 F 溶剂磁比较方法和溶剂磁β标度。