Nottingham Childrens Hospital and Neonatal Services, Family Health Division, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Nottingham Childrens Hospital and Neonatal Services, Family Health Division, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
J Tissue Viability. 2021 May;30(2):231-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Prevention and management of pressure injury is a key nurse-sensitive quality indicator. From clinical insights, pressure injury effects hospitalised neonates and children, however it is unclear how prevalent this is. The aim of this study was to quantify prevalence of pressure injury, assess skin integrity risk level, and quantify preventive interventions in both neonatal and child inpatient populations at a large children's hospital in the UK.
A cross-sectional study was undertaken, assessing the skin integrity of all children allocated to a paediatric or neonatal bed in June/July 2020. A data collection tool was adapted from two established pressure ulcer point prevalence surveys (EUPAP and Medstrom pre-prevalence survey). Risk assessment was performed using the Braden QD scale.
Eighty-eight participants were included, with median age of 0.85 years [range 0-17.5 years), with 32 (36%) of participants being preterm. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days [range 0-174 days]. Pressure ulcer prevalence was 3.4%. The majority of participants had at least two medical devices, with 16 (18.2%) having more than four. Having a medical device was associated with increased risk score of developing pressure injury (odds ratio [OR] 0.03, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.01-0.05, p = 0.02). Most children (39 (44%)) were reported not having proposed preventive measures in place aligned to their risk assessment. However, for those that did, 2 to 4 hourly repositioning was associated with a risk reduction on pressure damage (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.23, p = 0.01).
Overall, we found a low prevalence of pressure injury across preterm infants, children and young people at a tertiary children's hospital. Accurate risk assessment as well as availability and implementation of preventive interventions are a priority for healthcare institutes to avoid pressure injury.
预防和管理压力性损伤是关键的护士敏感质量指标。从临床角度来看,压力性损伤会影响住院的新生儿和儿童,但目前尚不清楚这种情况有多普遍。本研究的目的是量化英国一家大型儿童医院新生儿和住院儿童人群中压力性损伤的患病率,评估皮肤完整性风险水平,并量化预防干预措施。
本研究采用横断面研究方法,评估 2020 年 6 月/7 月分配到儿科或新生儿床位的所有儿童的皮肤完整性。数据收集工具改编自两项已建立的压力性溃疡现患率调查(EUPAP 和 Medstrom 预现患率调查)。风险评估使用Braden QD 量表进行。
共纳入 88 名参与者,中位年龄为 0.85 岁[范围 0-17.5 岁],其中 32 名(36%)参与者为早产儿。中位住院时间为 11 天[范围 0-174 天]。压力性溃疡的患病率为 3.4%。大多数参与者至少有两种医疗设备,16 名(18.2%)参与者有超过四种设备。使用医疗设备与压力性损伤风险评分增加相关(比值比 [OR] 0.03,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.01-0.05,p=0.02)。大多数儿童(39 名(44%))未报告按照风险评估实施建议的预防措施。然而,对于那些确实采取了预防措施的儿童,每 2 至 4 小时翻身与压力损伤风险降低相关(OR 0.13,95%CI 0.03-0.23,p=0.01)。
总的来说,我们在一家三级儿童医院的早产儿、儿童和青少年中发现压力性损伤的总体患病率较低。准确的风险评估以及预防干预措施的可用性和实施是医疗机构的优先事项,以避免压力性损伤。