Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Apr;12(8):1154-1161. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13883. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
The aim of this study was to discuss the safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses (3 mg) of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) at approximately 24 h or up to three days following treatment with etoposide and cisplatin (EP).
A total of 104 cycles from 31 patients were divided into a PEG-rhG-CSF prophylaxis group (PP-Group) and a control group (No-PP-Group). The PP-Group received a reduced dose of 3 mg of PEG-rhG-CSF within a minimum of 15 h and a maximum of 72 h following EP chemotherapy, while the rest did not receive any G-CSF prophylaxis (No-PP-Group). For both groups, complete blood counts, incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), grade III or IV neutropenia, and the use of antibiotics to treat neutropenia were recorded.
There was statistically no significant difference in the incidence of FN (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 1), antibiotic use due to neutropenia (0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.881), estimated lowest mean marginal (EM) platelet (106.56 × 10 /L vs. 127.70 × 10 /L, p = 0.056) and hemoglobin (110.48 g/L vs. 110.14 g/L, p = 0.906) levels between the two groups. However, when compared with the No-PP-group, the white blood cell count in the PP-group was significantly higher (EM means: 4.95 × 10 /L vs. 2.80 × 10 /L, p < 0.01), while the incidence of grade III or IV neutropenia was significantly lower (9.1% vs. 68.1%, p < 0.01).
The administration of a low dose (3 mg) of PEG-rhG-CSF within approximately 24 h or up to three days following EP treatment is safe and effective at reducing the risk of neutropenia. These findings bring a more flexible administration interval between PEG-rhG-CSF and EP treatment.
本研究旨在探讨在依托泊苷和顺铂(EP)治疗后约 24 小时或长达三天给予低剂量(3 毫克)聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)的安全性和疗效。
31 名患者的 104 个周期分为 PEG-rhG-CSF 预防组(PP 组)和对照组(无-PP 组)。PP 组在 EP 化疗后至少 15 小时和最长 72 小时内给予 3 毫克低剂量 PEG-rhG-CSF,而其余患者未接受任何 G-CSF 预防(无-PP 组)。两组均记录全血细胞计数、发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的发生率、III 级或 IV 级中性粒细胞减少症和抗生素治疗中性粒细胞减少症的情况。
FN 的发生率无统计学差异(0% vs. 1.4%,p=1),因中性粒细胞减少症而使用抗生素(0% vs. 2.7%,p=0.881),估计最低平均边际(EM)血小板(106.56×10/L vs. 127.70×10/L,p=0.056)和血红蛋白(110.48g/L vs. 110.14g/L,p=0.906)水平无统计学差异。然而,与无-PP 组相比,PP 组的白细胞计数明显更高(EM 均值:4.95×10/L vs. 2.80×10/L,p<0.01),而 III 级或 IV 级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率明显更低(9.1% vs. 68.1%,p<0.01)。
在 EP 治疗后约 24 小时或长达三天内给予低剂量(3 毫克)PEG-rhG-CSF 是安全有效的,可降低中性粒细胞减少症的风险。这些发现为 PEG-rhG-CSF 和 EP 治疗之间提供了更灵活的给药间隔。