Suppr超能文献

理论发展受阻:探索性研究与验证性研究之间的错误区分。

Arrested Theory Development: The Misguided Distinction Between Exploratory and Confirmatory Research.

作者信息

Szollosi Aba, Donkin Chris

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):717-724. doi: 10.1177/1745691620966796. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Abstract

Science progresses by finding and correcting problems in theories. Good theories are those that help facilitate this process by being : They explain what they are supposed to explain, they are consistent with other good theories, and they are not easily adaptable to explain anything. Here we argue that, rather than a lack of distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research, an abundance of flexible theories is a better explanation for the current replicability problems of psychology. We also explain why popular methods-oriented solutions fail to address the real problem of flexibility. Instead, we propose that a greater emphasis on theory criticism by argument might improve replicability.

摘要

科学通过发现并纠正理论中的问题而进步。好的理论是那些通过以下方式有助于推动这一过程的理论:它们解释了应该解释的内容,与其他好的理论相一致,并且不容易被随意用来解释任何事情。在此我们认为,心理学当前的可重复性问题,更好的解释是存在大量灵活的理论,而非探索性研究和验证性研究之间缺乏区分。我们还解释了为什么流行的以方法为导向的解决方案未能解决灵活性这一实际问题。相反,我们建议更多地通过论证来强调理论批判,这可能会提高可重复性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验