Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Emerg Med J. 2022 Mar;39(3):224-229. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209425. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
Emergency department (ED) boarding time is associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and inpatient mortality. Despite the documented impact of ED boarding on inpatient outcomes, a disparity continues to exist between the attention paid to the issue by inpatient and ED providers. A perceived lack of high yield strategies to address ED boarding from the perspective of the inpatient provider may discourage involvement in improvement initiatives on the subject. As such, further work is needed to identify inpatient metrics and strategies to address patient flow problems, and which may improve ED boarding time.
After initial system analysis, our multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) group defined the process time metric 'bed downtime'-the time from which a bed is vacated by a discharged patient to the time an ED patient is assigned to that bed. Using the Lean Sigma QI approach, this metric was targeted for improvement on the internal medicine hospitalist service at a tertiary care academic medical centre.
Interventions included improving inpatient provider awareness of the problem, real-time provider notification of empty beds, a weekly retrospective emailed performance dashboard and the creation of a guideline document for admission procedures.
This package of interventions was associated with a 125 min reduction in mean bed downtime for incoming ED patients (254 min to 129 min) admitted to the intervention unit.
Use of the bed downtime metric as a QI target was associated with marked improvements in process time during our project. The use of this metric may enhance the ability of inpatient providers to participate in QI efforts to improve patient flow from the ED. Further study is needed to determine if use of the metric may be effective at reducing boarding time without requiring alterations to LOS or discharge patterns.
急诊(ED)滞留时间与住院时间(LOS)和住院患者死亡率增加有关。尽管 ED 滞留对住院患者结局的影响有据可查,但住院和 ED 提供者对该问题的重视程度仍存在差异。从住院提供者的角度来看,解决 ED 滞留问题的高收益策略相对较少,这可能会阻碍他们参与该主题的改进计划。因此,需要进一步工作来确定住院患者指标和策略,以解决患者流量问题,并可能缩短 ED 滞留时间。
在初步系统分析后,我们的多学科质量改进(QI)小组定义了流程时间指标“床位停机时间”-从出院患者腾出床位到 ED 患者被分配到该床位的时间。使用精益西格玛 QI 方法,该指标针对三级护理学术医疗中心的内科住院医师服务进行了改进。
干预措施包括提高住院提供者对该问题的认识、实时通知提供者有空床、每周通过电子邮件发送回顾性绩效仪表板以及为入院程序创建指南文件。
这些干预措施的综合应用使进入 ED 的患者的平均床位停机时间缩短了 125 分钟(从 254 分钟缩短至 129 分钟)。
将床位停机时间指标用作 QI 目标与我们项目中过程时间的显著改善相关。该指标的使用可能会增强住院提供者参与改善 ED 患者流量的 QI 工作的能力。需要进一步研究确定是否使用该指标可以在不改变 LOS 或出院模式的情况下有效缩短滞留时间。