Director, USC Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Correspondence:
Program Specialist, USC Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1881206. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1881206.
The integration of human rights principles in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) research is often recognised to be of value. Good examples abound but lack of clarity persists as to what defines rights-inclusive SRH research. To help move the field forward, this article seeks to explore how key stakeholders responsible for funding and supporting rights in SRH research understand the strengths and weaknesses of what is being done and where, and begins to catalogue potential tools and actions for the future. Interviews with a range of key stakeholders including international civil servants, donors and researchers committed to and supportive of integrating rights into SRH research were conducted and analysed. Interviews confirmed important differences in what is understood to be SRH rights-oriented research and what it can accomplish. General barriers include lack of understanding about the importance of rights; lack of clarity as to the best approach to integration; fear of adding more work with little added benefit; as well as the lack of methodological guidance or published research methodologies that integrate rights. Suggestions include the development of a comprehensive checklist for each phase of research from developing a research statement through ultimately to publication; development of training modules and workshops; inclusion of rights in curricula; changes in journal requirements; and agreement among key funding sources to mandate the integration of rights principles in research proposals they receive. As a next step, cataloguing issues and concerns at local levels can help move the integration of human rights in SRH research from rhetoric to reality.
将人权原则融入性健康和生殖健康(SRH)研究中通常被认为是有价值的。有很多很好的例子,但对于什么是包含权利的 SRH 研究,仍然缺乏明确的定义。为了推动这一领域的发展,本文旨在探讨负责为 SRH 研究中的权利提供资金和支持的主要利益相关者如何理解正在进行的工作的优缺点,并开始为未来制定潜在的工具和行动。对包括国际公务员、捐助者和致力于并支持将权利纳入 SRH 研究的研究人员在内的一系列主要利益相关者进行了采访并进行了分析。采访证实了对以权利为导向的 SRH 研究的理解以及它可以实现的目标存在重要差异。一般障碍包括对权利重要性的理解不足;对整合的最佳方法缺乏明确性;担心增加更多工作但收益甚微;以及缺乏将权利纳入其中的方法指导或已发表的研究方法。建议包括为研究的每个阶段(从制定研究声明到最终出版)制定全面的检查表;开发培训模块和研讨会;将权利纳入课程;改变期刊要求;并在主要资金来源之间达成一致,要求他们收到的研究提案中纳入权利原则。作为下一步,在地方层面上对问题和关注点进行分类,可以帮助将人权融入 SRH 研究从言辞变为现实。