Suppr超能文献

老年人尿路感染应用抗生素预防的获益与危害。

The Benefits and Harms of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infection in Older Adults.

机构信息

Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Hotel Dieu Shaver Health and Rehabilitation Centre, St Catharines, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;73(3):e782-e791. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab116.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of antibiotics in preventing urinary tract infection (UTI) in older adults is unknown. We sought to quantify the benefits and risks of antibiotic prophylaxis among older adults.

METHODS

We conducted a matched cohort study comparing older adults (≥66 years) receiving antibiotic prophylaxis, defined as antibiotic treatment for ≥30 days starting within 30 days of a positive culture, with patients with positive urine cultures who received antibiotic treatment but did not receive prophylaxis. We matched each prophylaxis recipient to 10 nonrecipients based on organism, number of positive cultures, and propensity score. Outcomes included (1) emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization for UTI, sepsis, or bloodstream infection within 1 year; (2) acquisition of antibiotic resistance in urinary tract pathogens; and (3) antibiotic-related complications.

RESULTS

Overall, 4.7% (151/3190) of UTI prophylaxis patients and 3.6% (n = 1092/30 542) of controls required an ED visit or hospitalization for UTI, sepsis, or bloodstream infection (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.57). Acquisition of antibiotic resistance to any urinary antibiotic (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.18-1.44) and to the specific prophylaxis agent (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.80-2.24) was higher in patients receiving prophylaxis. While the overall risk of antibiotic-related complications was similar between groups (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, .94-1.22), the risk of Clostridioidesdifficile and general medication adverse events was higher in prophylaxis recipients (HR [95% CI], 1.56 [1.05-2.23] and 1.62 [1.11-2.29], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults with UTI, the harms of long-term antibiotic prophylaxis may outweigh their benefits.

摘要

背景

抗生素在预防老年人尿路感染(UTI)中的作用尚不清楚。我们旨在量化老年人使用抗生素预防的益处和风险。

方法

我们进行了一项匹配队列研究,比较了接受抗生素预防的老年人(≥66 岁)和接受抗生素治疗但未接受预防的阳性尿液培养患者。抗生素预防定义为在阳性培养后 30 天内开始使用抗生素治疗≥30 天。我们根据病原体、阳性培养数量和倾向评分,将每位预防接受者与 10 名非接受者相匹配。主要结局包括(1)1 年内因 UTI、败血症或血流感染而就诊于急诊(ED)或住院;(2)尿路感染病原体对抗生素产生耐药性;(3)抗生素相关并发症。

结果

总体而言,151/3190(4.7%)例 UTI 预防患者和 1092/30542(3.6%)例对照者因 UTI、败血症或血流感染而就诊于 ED 或住院(风险比[HR],1.33;95%置信区间[CI],1.12-1.57)。接受预防者对抗生素的耐药性(任何尿路抗生素[HR,1.31;95% CI,1.18-1.44]和特定预防药物[HR,2.01;95% CI,1.80-2.24])的获得率更高。虽然两组抗生素相关并发症的总体风险相似(HR,1.08;95% CI,0.94-1.22),但预防者中发生艰难梭菌和一般药物不良反应的风险更高(HR [95% CI],1.56 [1.05-2.23]和 1.62 [1.11-2.29])。

结论

在患有 UTI 的老年人中,长期使用抗生素预防的危害可能超过其益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验