Suppr超能文献

考虑到与 Daily QA3 装置中的电离室相关的不确定性,监测束质稳定性。

Monitoring beam-quality constancy considering uncertainties associated with ionization chambers in Daily QA3 device.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Healthcare Solution, Douzone Bizon, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0246845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246845. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

This study evaluates the changes occurring in the X-ray energy of a linear accelerator (LINAC) using a Daily QA3 detector system. This is accomplished by comparing the Daily QA3 results against those obtained using a water phantom. The X-energy levels of a LINAC were monitored over a duration of 1 month using the Daily QA3 system. Moreover, to account for the uncertainty, the reproducibility of the Daily QA3 ionization-chamber results was assessed by performing repeated measurements (12 per day). Subsequently, the energy-monitoring results were compared with the energy-change results calculated using the water-phantom percentage depth dose (PDD) ratio. As observed, the 6- and 10-MV beams experienced average daily energy-level changes of (-0.30 ± 0.32)% and (0.05 ± 0.38)%, respectively, during repeated measurements. The corresponding energy changes equaled (-0.30 ± 0.55)% and (-0.05 ± 0.48)%, respectively, when considering the measurement uncertainty. The Daily QA3 measurements performed at 6 MV demonstrated a variation of (2.15 ± 0.81)% (i.e., up to 3%). Meanwhile, the corresponding measurements performed using a water phantom demonstrated an increase in the PDD ratio from 0.577 to 0.580 (i.e., approximately 0.5%). At 10 MV, the energy variation in the Daily QA3 measurements equaled (-0.41 ± 0.82)% (i.e., within 1.5%), whereas the corresponding water phantom PDD ratio remained constant at 0.626. These results reveal that the Daily QA3 system can be used to monitor small energy changes occurring within radiotherapy machines. This demonstrates its potential for use as a secondary system for monitoring energy changes as part of the daily quality-assurance workflow.

摘要

本研究使用 Daily QA3 探测器系统评估直线加速器 (LINAC) 的 X 射线能量变化。这是通过将 Daily QA3 结果与使用水模获得的结果进行比较来实现的。使用 Daily QA3 系统在 1 个月的时间内监测 LINAC 的 X 能量水平。此外,为了考虑不确定性,通过重复测量(每天 12 次)评估 Daily QA3 电离室结果的可重复性。随后,将能量监测结果与使用水模百分深度剂量 (PDD) 比计算得出的能量变化结果进行比较。结果表明,在重复测量过程中,6 和 10 MV 束的平均每日能量水平变化分别为 (-0.30 ± 0.32)% 和 (0.05 ± 0.38)%。当考虑测量不确定性时,相应的能量变化分别为 (-0.30 ± 0.55)% 和 (-0.05 ± 0.48)%。在 6 MV 处进行的 Daily QA3 测量显示出 (2.15 ± 0.81)% 的变化(即高达 3%)。与此同时,使用水模进行的相应测量显示 PDD 比从 0.577 增加到 0.580(即大约 0.5%)。在 10 MV 处,Daily QA3 测量中的能量变化等于 (-0.41 ± 0.82)%(即在 1.5%以内),而相应的水模 PDD 比保持在 0.626 不变。这些结果表明,Daily QA3 系统可用于监测放射治疗机中发生的小能量变化。这表明它有可能作为每日质量保证工作流程中能量变化监测的辅助系统使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/800d/7888663/80a33e62b818/pone.0246845.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Monitoring beam-quality constancy considering uncertainties associated with ionization chambers in Daily QA3 device.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0246845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246845. eCollection 2021.
3
Monitoring linear accelerators electron beam energy constancy with a 2D ionization chamber array and double-wedge phantom.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jan;21(1):18-25. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12751. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
5
[Daily quality assurance of linac radiation field].
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi. 2011 Sep;35(5):386-8.
7
Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
Med Phys. 2017 Oct;44(10):5433-5444. doi: 10.1002/mp.12463. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
9
A feasibility study of Dynamic Phantom scanner for quality assurance of photon beam profiles at various gantry angles.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2005 Spring;6(2):50-61. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v6i2.2081. Epub 2005 May 19.
10
Constancy checks of well-type ionization chambers with external-beam radiation units.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Nov 8;16(6):508-514. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5608.

引用本文的文献

1
Repurposing DailyQA3 for an efficient and spot position sensitive daily quality assurance tool for proton therapy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Jul;25(7):e14348. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14348. Epub 2024 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

2
Monitoring linear accelerators electron beam energy constancy with a 2D ionization chamber array and double-wedge phantom.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jan;21(1):18-25. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12751. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
3
AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.a.: Linear accelerator performance tests.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jul;18(4):23-39. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12080. Epub 2017 May 26.
4
A comparison of methods for monitoring photon beam energy constancy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 8;17(6):242-253. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6454.
5
Monitoring Daily QA 3 constancy for routine quality assurance on linear accelerators.
Phys Med. 2016 Nov;32(11):1479-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
6
Clinical implementation of photon beam flatness measurements to verify beam quality.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Nov 8;16(6):340-345. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5752.
7
On beam quality and flatness of radiotherapy megavoltage photon beams.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2016 Mar;39(1):135-45. doi: 10.1007/s13246-015-0408-8. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
8
Daily QA in proton therapy using a single commercially available detector.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Nov 8;15(6):5005. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.5005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验