Guarnieri Renzo, Savio Luca, Bermonds Alessandro, Testarelli Luca
Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, University "La Sapienza", RomeItaly.
Private practice, TorinoItaly.
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2020 Dec 31;11(4):e2. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2020.11402. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to compare clinical outcomes, soft tissues conditions and differences in marginal bone loss between implants with a laser-microgrooved collar placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, over a period of 5 years after functional loading.
Patients of Group 1 underwent extractions with sockets preservation using porcine-derived bone, covered with collagen membrane. Group 2 underwent extractions without socket preservation. Patients of Group 1 received implants in grafted sites, and Group 2 received implants in spontaneously healed bone using a maxillary sinus lift with crestal approach.
Over the observation period, the overall clinical success rate in Group 1 and Group 2 was 98% and 100%, respectively, with no differences between the procedures and implants used. Cumulative radiographic marginal bone loss ranged from 0.03 to 0.39 mm after 60 months of functional loading. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal bone loss between short and standard-length implants placed in grafted extraction sockets and in pristine bone.
Short and standard implants with a laser-microgrooved collar, placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, exhibited no statistical difference in success rate, clinical parameters and marginal bone loss.
这项回顾性多中心队列研究的目的是比较功能负荷5年后,植入于4至5个月前移植的上颌后牙拔除窝和上颌后牙原始骨(自发愈合的上颌后牙拔除窝)中的带激光微槽颈部的种植体的临床结果、软组织状况以及边缘骨丢失的差异,上颌后牙原始骨采用骨凿介导的上颌窦底提升术。
第1组患者拔牙时采用猪源骨进行牙槽窝保存,并覆盖胶原膜。第2组患者拔牙时未进行牙槽窝保存。第1组患者在移植部位植入种植体,第2组患者通过嵴顶入路上颌窦提升术在自发愈合的骨中植入种植体。
在观察期内,第1组和第2组的总体临床成功率分别为98%和100%,所采用的手术和种植体之间无差异。功能负荷60个月后,累积影像学边缘骨丢失范围为0.03至0.39毫米。植入于移植拔牙窝和原始骨中的短种植体和标准长度种植体之间,边缘骨丢失无统计学显著差异。
植入于4至5个月前移植的上颌后牙拔除窝和通过骨凿介导的上颌窦底提升术植入于上颌后牙原始骨(自发愈合的上颌后牙拔除窝)中的带激光微槽颈部的短种植体和标准种植体,在成功率、临床参数和边缘骨丢失方面无统计学差异。