Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 Jun;23(6):1260-1263. doi: 10.1111/jch.14213. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
Although hypertension is a contributing factor to higher stroke occurrence in the Stroke Belt, little is known about post-stroke hypertension medication use in Stroke Belt residents. Through the use of national Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys from 2015, 2017, and 2019; we compared unadjusted and adjusted estimates of post-stroke hypertension medication use by Stroke Belt residence status. Similar levels of post-stroke hypertension medication use were observed between Stroke Belt residents (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.33) and non-Stroke Belt residents. After adjustment, Stroke Belt residents had 1.14 times the odds of post-stroke hypertension medication use (95% CI: 0.92, 1.41) compared to non-Stroke Belt residents. Findings from this study suggest that there is little difference between post-stroke hypertension medication use between Stroke Belt and non-Stroke Belt residents. However, further work is needed to assess whether use of other non-medicinal methods of post-stroke hypertension control differs by Stroke Belt residence status.
虽然高血压是“中风带”中风发生率较高的一个因素,但对于“中风带”居民中风后使用高血压药物的情况知之甚少。通过使用国家行为风险因素监测系统 2015 年、2017 年和 2019 年的调查数据,我们比较了居住在“中风带”和非“中风带”居民中风后使用高血压药物的未经调整和调整后的估计值。居住在“中风带”的居民(OR:1.09,95%CI:0.89,1.33)和非“中风带”居民的中风后高血压药物使用水平相似。调整后,与非“中风带”居民相比,“中风带”居民中风后使用高血压药物的几率高出 1.14 倍(95%CI:0.92,1.41)。本研究结果表明,“中风带”和非“中风带”居民中风后高血压药物使用情况差异不大。然而,需要进一步研究评估“中风带”居民的中风后高血压控制是否存在其他非药物治疗方法的差异。