Nutrition and Dietetics, Oviva UK Ltd, London, UK.
Department of Allied Health Professions, Sport and Exercise, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Clin Obes. 2021 Jun;11(3):e12444. doi: 10.1111/cob.12444. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
Obesity continues to be a global health problem with significant costs associated with management, treatment, and obesity-related comorbidities. Tier 3 weight management programmes support patients with complex obesity and traditionally offer interventions through face-to-face delivery. In this study, a service evaluation compared weight loss for adults with a BMI ≥ 45 kg/m or ≥ 40 kg/m with a comorbidity, who were offered a non-randomized dietetic intervention through face-to-face, telephone, or digital support using the Oviva smartphone app as part of a tier 3 weight management programme. One hundred and sixty-nine patients commenced the core programme. There were no significant differences in weight loss between patients receiving face-to-face (5.3 ± 5.5 kg [-4.1%]), telephone (-4 ± 5.3 kg [-3.4%]) and digital support (-6.1 ± 4.9 kg [-4.5%]) (P = .061), with data reported as intention-to-treat using baseline observation carried forward imputation. Completer data were also analysed at an optional 12-week follow-up where weight loss was maintained with no significant differences between face-to-face (-7.6 ± 9.3 kg [-5.6%]) and digital support (-9.2 ± 7.6) kg [-6.8%]) (P = .135). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the acceptability of the interventions (P = .261). Due to the potential scalability, resource, and cost-savings of digital care, and improvement in accessibility for some people, digital delivery of weight management programmes should be considered as a care option in weight management services.
肥胖仍然是一个全球性的健康问题,与管理、治疗和肥胖相关的合并症相关的成本巨大。第三层体重管理计划为患有复杂肥胖症的患者提供支持,传统上通过面对面的方式提供干预措施。在这项研究中,服务评估比较了通过面对面、电话或使用 Oviva 智能手机应用程序的数字支持为 BMI≥45kg/m 或≥40kg/m 且伴有合并症的成年人提供非随机饮食干预的减肥效果,作为第三层体重管理计划的一部分。169 名患者开始了核心计划。接受面对面(5.3±5.5kg[-4.1%])、电话(-4±5.3kg[-3.4%])和数字支持(-6.1±4.9kg[-4.5%])的患者之间的体重减轻没有显著差异(P=0.061),数据报告为意向治疗,使用基线观察向前插补法。还分析了可选的 12 周随访时的完成者数据,体重减轻保持不变,面对面(-7.6±9.3kg[-5.6%])和数字支持(-9.2±7.6kg[-6.8%])之间没有显著差异(P=0.135)。此外,干预措施的可接受性没有显著差异(P=0.261)。由于数字护理具有潜在的可扩展性、资源节约和成本节约,以及一些人获得改善的便利性,因此应考虑将数字交付体重管理计划作为体重管理服务的一种护理选择。