Service d'hépatologie et de soins intensifs digestifs, CHRU Jean-Minjoz, 25030 Besançon cedex, France; CIC-BT, CHRU Jean-Minjoz, 25030 Besançon cedex, France.
Service d'hépatologie et de soins intensifs digestifs, CHRU Jean-Minjoz, 25030 Besançon cedex, France.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan-Jun;44S:100003. doi: 10.1016/j.clirex.2020.100003. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
The reported hepatotoxicity of methotrexate underlines the need for a repeated non-invasive and reliable evaluation of liver fibrosis. We estimated, using a non-invasive strategy, the prevalence of significant liver fibrosis in patients treated by methotrexate and the predictors of significant fibrosis (fibrosis≥F2).
Fibrosis was prospectively evaluated using 9 non-invasive tests in consecutive patients with psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, or Crohn's disease. Significant fibrosis was assessed without liver biopsy by defining a "specific method" (result given by the majority of the tests) and a "sensitive method" (at least one test indicating a stage≥F2).
One hundred and thirty-one patients (66 Psoriasis, 40 rheumatoid arthritis, and 25 Crohn's disease) were enrolled, including 83 receiving methotrexate. Seven tests were performed on average per patient, with a complete concordance in 75% of cases. Fibroscan® was interpretable in only 61% of patients. The best performances (AUROC>0.9) for predicting significant fibrosis were obtained by tests dedicated to steatohepatitis (FibroMeter NAFLD, NFS and FPI). The prevalence of fibrosis≥F2 according to the "specific" or the "sensitive" assessment of fibrosis was 10% and 28%, respectively. Methotrexate exposure did not influence the fibrosis stage. Factors independently associated with significant fibrosis according our "sensitive method" were age, male gender, and metabolic syndrome.
We provided a non-invasive approach for identifying liver fibrosis≥F2 by using 8 biochemical tests and Fibroscan®. In this population, the risk of significant fibrosis was related to age, male gender, and presence of metabolic syndrome, but was not influenced by methotrexate.
甲氨蝶呤的肝毒性报告强调了需要对肝纤维化进行重复的非侵入性和可靠评估。我们使用非侵入性策略估计了接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者中显著肝纤维化的患病率,以及显著纤维化(纤维化≥F2)的预测因子。
前瞻性地评估了连续患有银屑病、类风湿关节炎或克罗恩病的患者的纤维化情况,使用了 9 种非侵入性检测方法。在没有肝活检的情况下,通过定义“特定方法”(大多数检测方法给出的结果)和“敏感方法”(至少有一个检测方法表明≥F2 期)来评估显著纤维化。
共纳入 131 例患者(66 例银屑病、40 例类风湿关节炎和 25 例克罗恩病),其中 83 例接受了甲氨蝶呤治疗。平均每个患者进行了 7 项检查,75%的病例检查结果完全一致。仅 61%的患者可进行 Fibroscan®检测。用于预测显著纤维化的最佳性能(AUROC>0.9)是由专门用于脂肪性肝炎的检测方法获得的(FibroMeter NAFLD、NFS 和 FPI)。根据纤维化的“特定”或“敏感”评估,纤维化≥F2 的患病率分别为 10%和 28%。甲氨蝶呤暴露不影响纤维化分期。根据我们的“敏感方法”,与显著纤维化独立相关的因素是年龄、男性和代谢综合征。
我们提供了一种使用 8 种生化检测方法和 Fibroscan®来识别纤维化≥F2 的非侵入性方法。在该人群中,显著纤维化的风险与年龄、男性和代谢综合征有关,但不受甲氨蝶呤的影响。