Shakir Taner, Iqbal Muhammad Rafaih, Darwish Nourelhuda M, Kirmani Naveed
General Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, GBR.
Cureus. 2021 Jan 13;13(1):e12685. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12685.
Introduction The global COVID-19 pandemic had a deleterious effect upon elective and emergency surgery. Focus of patient care was directed to emergency services. Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Northern Ireland guidelines advised a trend towards conservative management. Traditional surgical intervention was reserved only for selected cases only. We evaluated our emergency practice over a four-week period during the first peak of COVID-19. Methods A retrospective single-centre analysis was performed of consecutive patients seen by the emergency general and vascular surgery on-call team in a District General Hospital over a four-week period (30 March 2020-26 April 2020). Primary outcome was 30-day COVID-19 mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day complications, readmission rate and non-COVID-19-related mortality. Adherence to intercollegiate guidelines was also assessed. Results A total of 184 patients were assessed during the period. The median age was 55 years (interquartile range 34-75), with a male:female ratio of 1:0.7. Thirty-day COVID-19- and non-COVID-19-related mortalities were 3% and 8%, respectively. Thirteen percent of patients developed complications and 9% represented to the emergency department within 30 days. Conservative management was initially employed in 78% of patients. This had success rates in appendicitis and cholecystitis of 72% and 75%, respectively. A CT thorax was included in 89% having a CT abdomen and pelvis. Thirty-eight percent had a COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) swab test performed throughout the study period. Fifty-two percent of individuals who underwent emergency surgery had a swab performed prior to operative intervention. Conclusions Conservative management seems to be reasonably effective and may re-shape the way we treat a proportion of surgical pathologies in the future. Further long-term data are required in order to evaluate this. A paucity of PCR testing was due to nationwide capacity shortcomings. This must be addressed in future peaks with rapid testing in order to triage patients to the appropriate setting.
引言 全球新冠疫情对择期手术和急诊手术产生了有害影响。患者护理重点转向了急诊服务。英国及北爱尔兰外科医生协会的指南建议采取保守治疗的趋势。传统手术干预仅保留给特定病例。我们评估了在新冠疫情第一个高峰期的四周内我们的急诊实践情况。方法 对一家地区综合医院的急诊普通外科和血管外科值班团队在四周期间(2020年3月30日至2020年4月26日)接诊的连续患者进行了回顾性单中心分析。主要结局是30天新冠死亡率。次要结局是30天并发症、再入院率和非新冠相关死亡率。还评估了对校际指南的遵循情况。结果 在此期间共评估了184例患者。中位年龄为55岁(四分位间距34 - 75),男女比例为1:0.7。30天新冠相关死亡率和非新冠相关死亡率分别为3%和8%。13%的患者出现并发症,9%的患者在30天内返回急诊科。最初78%的患者采用了保守治疗。在阑尾炎和胆囊炎中的成功率分别为72%和75%。89%进行腹部和盆腔CT检查的患者同时进行了胸部CT检查。在整个研究期间,38%的患者进行了新冠聚合酶链反应(PCR)拭子检测。52%接受急诊手术的患者在手术干预前进行了拭子检测。结论 保守治疗似乎相当有效,可能会在未来重塑我们治疗一部分外科疾病的方式。需要进一步的长期数据来评估这一点。PCR检测不足是由于全国范围内的能力短缺。在未来高峰期必须通过快速检测来解决这一问题,以便将患者分诊到合适的环境。