Fan Hsiu-Lung, Hsieh Chung-Bao, Chang Hao-Ming, Wang Ning-Chi, Lin Ya-Wen, Chen Teng-Wei
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Section 2, ChengKung Road, Taipei City, 114, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Division of Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Oct;25(10):2524-2534. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04914-5. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of infection between liver transplant patients with and without simultaneous splenectomy.
We retrospectively analyzed the records of 211 patients who underwent liver transplantation in the Tri-Service General Hospital from 2012 to 2017. The frequency of blood cultures obtained after liver transplantation; incidence of bacteremia, pathogens, and complications; and overall survival rates were compared between the groups.
One hundred thirty-three of 211 patients underwent liver transplantation without simultaneous splenectomy. There were no significant differences in the frequency of blood cultures obtained after liver transplantation (non-splenectomy group and splenectomy group: 63% and 62%, respectively); incidences of bacteremia after liver transplantation (21% and 21%, respectively), repeat bacteremia (39% and 35%, respectively), cytomegalovirus infection (4% and 3%, respectively), herpes infection (6% and 7%, respectively), and fungal infection (3% and 3%, respectively); and overall survival rate between the two groups. However, there was a significant difference in infection-related deaths between the groups. Simultaneous splenectomy and episodes of antibody-related rejection were significant risk factors associated with infection-related death in multivariate analyses.
Although simultaneous splenectomy does not increase the incidence of infection, simultaneous splenectomy definitely carries risks of infection-related mortality in liver transplantation.
本研究旨在比较同期行脾切除术和未行脾切除术的肝移植患者的感染结局。
我们回顾性分析了2012年至2017年在三军总医院接受肝移植的211例患者的记录。比较了两组肝移植后血培养的频率、菌血症发生率、病原体及并发症情况以及总体生存率。
211例患者中有133例未同期行脾切除术。肝移植后血培养频率(非脾切除组和脾切除组分别为63%和62%)、肝移植后菌血症发生率(分别为21%和21%)、复发性菌血症发生率(分别为39%和35%)、巨细胞病毒感染率(分别为4%和3%)、疱疹感染率(分别为6%和7%)、真菌感染率(分别为3%和3%)以及两组总体生存率之间均无显著差异。然而,两组之间感染相关死亡存在显著差异。在多因素分析中,同期脾切除术和抗体相关排斥发作是与感染相关死亡相关的显著危险因素。
虽然同期脾切除术不会增加感染发生率,但在肝移植中,同期脾切除术确实存在感染相关死亡风险。