Suppr超能文献

VI-RADS 在评估膀胱癌肌层侵犯中的有效性、可靠性和评审者接受度:一项多中心前瞻性研究。

The validity, reliability, and reviewer acceptance of VI-RADS in assessing muscle invasion by bladder cancer: a multicenter prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Radio-diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Department of Urology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6949-6961. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07765-5. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess diagnostic validity and reliability of VI-RADS in predicting muscle invasion by bladder cancer (BCa) and evaluate reviewer acceptance of VI-RADS for clinical routine.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter study enrolled 331 patients with suspected/untreated BCa who underwent preoperative multiparametric MRI examination (mp-MRI) of the urinary bladder. Four experienced radiologists independently evaluated all mp-MRI using VI-RADS. The diagnostic validity of VI-RADS for predicting muscle invasion by BCa was calculated using histopathology of the first transurethral resection bladder tumor (TURBT) and second TURBT as the reference standards. The kappa statistics (κ) were applied to assess the interreader agreement (IRA). Reviewer acceptance was evaluated with questionnaires.

RESULTS

The risk of muscle invasion in VI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 after the first and second TURBT was 21.8%, 45.8%, 69.6%, and 96.4% and 24.4%, 58.3%, 87%, and 99.2%, respectively. The overall diagnostic validity of VI-RADS was high. The optimal cut-off value for predicting muscle invasion after first TURBT was > VI-RADS 3 (sensitivity = 84.1% and specificity = 92.3%), and after second TURBT was > VI-RADS 2 (sensitivity = 89.9% and specificity = 90.1%). VI-RADS categorization showed a very good IRA (κ = 0.93). Reviewers fully agreed with the statement, "The application of structured reporting of bladder tumor should be encouraged" (score = 20).

CONCLUSIONS

VI-RADS showed high diagnostic validity and reliability for predicting muscle invasion by BCa, especially VI-RADS 4 and 5. However, VI-RADS 2 and 3 require further modifications to enhance their diagnostic validity. VI-RADS is highly encouraged to be used in daily practice.

KEY POINTS

• VI-RADS showed high diagnostic validity and reliability in predicting BCa muscle invasion, especially VI-RADS 4 and 5. • In VI-RADS 2 and 3, we observed a notable percentage of BCa with muscle invasion and this would require further modifications to enhance the diagnostic validity for these scores. • Overall VI-RADS is well-accepted by radiologists who recommend it for daily practice.

摘要

目的

评估 VI-RADS 预测膀胱癌(BCa)肌层侵犯的诊断准确性和可靠性,并评估其在临床常规中的应用接受度。

方法

前瞻性多中心研究纳入了 331 例疑似/未经治疗的 BCa 患者,这些患者均接受了术前多参数 MRI 检查(mp-MRI)。4 名经验丰富的放射科医生使用 VI-RADS 对所有 mp-MRI 进行独立评估。以首次经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBT)和第二次 TURBT 的组织病理学结果为参考标准,计算 VI-RADS 预测 BCa 肌层侵犯的诊断准确性。采用κ 统计量(κ)评估观察者间一致性(IRA)。通过问卷调查评估审阅者的接受程度。

结果

在第一次和第二次 TURBT 后,VI-RADS 2、3、4 和 5 预测 BCa 肌层侵犯的风险分别为 21.8%、45.8%、69.6%和 96.4%,以及 24.4%、58.3%、87%和 99.2%。VI-RADS 的整体诊断准确性较高。首次 TURBT 后预测肌层侵犯的最佳截断值为>VI-RADS 3(灵敏度=84.1%,特异性=92.3%),第二次 TURBT 后为>VI-RADS 2(灵敏度=89.9%,特异性=90.1%)。VI-RADS 分类显示出非常好的 IRA(κ=0.93)。审阅者完全同意“应鼓励膀胱癌结构化报告的应用”的说法(评分=20)。

结论

VI-RADS 对预测 BCa 肌层侵犯具有较高的诊断准确性和可靠性,尤其是 VI-RADS 4 和 5。然而,VI-RADS 2 和 3 需要进一步修改以提高其诊断准确性。VI-RADS 非常鼓励在日常实践中使用。

关键点

  1. VI-RADS 在预测 BCa 肌层侵犯方面具有较高的诊断准确性和可靠性,尤其是 VI-RADS 4 和 5。

  2. 在 VI-RADS 2 和 3 中,我们观察到相当比例的 BCa 有肌层侵犯,这需要进一步修改以提高这些评分的诊断准确性。

  3. 总体而言,放射科医生对 VI-RADS 接受程度较高,推荐其用于日常实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验