INTRODUCTION

Brief (≤4 sessions) behavioral treatment for insomnia (BBTi) improves insomnia symptoms in older adults. Findings for BBTi-related improvements in objective cognition are mixed, with our recent trial reporting no effects. Metacognition (appraisal of one's own performance) has not been examined. This study examined the effects of BBTi on metacognition in older adults with insomnia.

METHODS

Older adults with insomnia [N = 62, Mage = 69.45 (SD = 7.71)] were randomized to 4-weeks of BBTi (n = 32; psychoeducation, sleep hygiene, stimulus control, sleep restriction, relaxation, review/maintenance) or self-monitoring control (SMC; n = 30; social conversations). Throughout the study (2 week baseline, 4 week treatment, 2 week post-treament, 2 week 3-month followup), participants completed daily paper/pencil cognitive tasks (measuring verbal memory, attention, processing speed and reasoning) and provided daily metacognition ratings of their performance in four areas: quality, satisfaction, compared to same age peers, compared to own ability. Two-week averages of metacognitive ratings were calculated for baseline, treatment-first half, treatment-second half, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up. Multilevel Modeling examined treatment effects (BBTi/SMC) over time on metacognition, controlling for age and sex.

RESULTS

A significant group by time interaction (p = 0.05) revealed consistent improvements over time in better metacognitive ratings relative to same age peers for BBTi. Specifically, baseline ratings [mean (M) = 51.21, standard error (SE) = 3.15] improved at first half of treatment (M = 56.65, SE = 3.15, p < 0.001), maintained improvement at second-half of treatment (p = 0.18), showed additional improvement at post-treatment (M = 60.79, SE = 3.15, p = 0.02), and maintained improvement at follow-up (M = 62.30, SE = 3.15; p = 0.02). SMC prompted inconsistent and smaller improvements between baseline (M = 53.24, SE = 3.29) and first-half of treatment (M = 56.62, SE = 3.28; p = 0.004), with additional improvement at second-half of treatment (M = 59.39, SE = 3.28; p = 0.02) that was maintained at post-treatment (p = 0.73) and returned to levels observed at first-half of treatment (M = 57.78, SE = 3.21; p = 0.55). Significant main effects of time (all ps < 0.001) for other metacognition variables (Quality, Satisfaction, Compared to own ability) indicated general improvements over time for both groups.

DISCUSSION

Metacognition generally improved over time regardless of treatment. BBTi selectively improved ratings of performance relative to same age peers. Repeated objective testing alone may improve metacognition in older adults with insomnia. Better understanding of metacognition and how to improve it has important implications for older adults as metacognitive complaints have been associated with mild cognitive impairment.