Mbadugha Uche J, Surani Salim, Akuffo Nana, Udeani George
Pharmacy, Corpus Christi Medical Center, Corpus Christi, USA.
Internal Medicine, Corpus Christi Medical Center, Corpus Christi, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Jan 15;13(1):e12719. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12719.
Patients with evidence of fluid overload or heart failure (HF) without clinical symptoms of pneumonia are often treated with antimicrobial therapy for pneumonia. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the use of antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients with fluid overload or heart failure diagnosed as pneumonia. A retrospective chart review of patients on antimicrobial therapy treated for pneumonia in the intensive care unit was conducted. The study's primary outcome was the number of cases with no evidence of pneumonia, including fluid overload or heart failure, managed with antimicrobial therapy for pneumonia. Patients on antimicrobial therapy for other infections were excluded. Appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy was based on radiographic evidence, clinical data, and presentation. Patient group categories were A (pneumonia) and B (no evidence of pneumonia, fluid overload, and heart failure). Based on the subdivision of patients in Group B, where there was no evidence of pneumonia, we further classified it into two subgroups: heart failure (HF)/fluid overload (Group B1) and no evidence of HF or fluid overload (Group B2). Patients with evidence of pneumonia (Group A) were compared to the group with fluid overload and heart failure (Group B1). A p-value of < 0.05% was considered significant for detecting statistical difference. Post-screening, data on 56 patients were collected for the study and analyzed. Mean body temperature and white blood cell count were 37.6 + 0.6 C, and 17.4 + 6.88 x10 µL, respectively. Based on radiographic evidence, clinical data, and presentation, 29 (52%) were classified under Group A, while 27 (48%) were classified under Group B. Median brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) for Group A vs. Group B was 514 (IQR: 1077) vs. 758 (2212) pg/mL p=0.14. The median duration of inpatient antimicrobial therapy was 7 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6) vs. 6 (IQR: 4) days, p=0.52, while the median duration of the total (inpatient and discharge prescription) antimicrobial therapy was 11 (IQR: 6) vs. 11 (IQR: 5), p=0.21. Patients with evidence of pneumonia (Group A) were compared to the group with fluid overload and heart failure (Group B1). The median BNP for the two groups was 514 (IQR: 1077) vs. 1040 (2094) pg/mL, p=0.04. Patients with documented echocardiographic evidence of ejection fraction < 55% were 4 vs. 14 for Groups A and B1, respectively. Additionally, the median BNP for Group A vs. Group B2 was 514 (IQR: 1077) vs. 189 (418) pg/mL, p=0.02. These findings demonstrate a 48% inappropriate use of antimicrobial therapy in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), or fluid congestion misdiagnosed as pneumonia. There was a significant difference in the median BNP observed in patients with pneumonia compared to those with fluid overload and heart failure treated as pneumonia. More cases of patients with elevated BNP and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were observed in patients with fluid overload or CHF treated as pneumonia than those diagnosed with pneumonia alone. Appropriate interpretation of radiographic evidence, laboratory data, and critical clinical assessment for the use of empiric antimicrobial therapy in this population is warranted.
有液体超负荷或心力衰竭(HF)证据但无肺炎临床症状的患者常接受针对肺炎的抗菌治疗。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估抗菌治疗在被诊断为肺炎的液体超负荷或心力衰竭重症患者中的使用情况。对重症监护病房接受肺炎抗菌治疗的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。该研究的主要结果是接受针对肺炎的抗菌治疗但无肺炎证据(包括液体超负荷或心力衰竭)的病例数。排除接受其他感染抗菌治疗的患者。抗菌治疗的适当性基于影像学证据、临床数据和临床表现。患者分组为A组(肺炎)和B组(无肺炎、液体超负荷和心力衰竭证据)。基于B组中无肺炎证据的患者细分,我们进一步将其分为两个亚组:心力衰竭(HF)/液体超负荷(B1组)和无HF或液体超负荷证据(B2组)。将有肺炎证据的患者(A组)与有液体超负荷和心力衰竭的患者(B1组)进行比较。p值<0.05%被认为有统计学差异。筛查后,收集了56例患者的数据进行研究和分析。平均体温和白细胞计数分别为37.6 + 0.6℃和17.4 + 6.88×10⁹/μL。根据影像学证据、临床数据和临床表现,29例(52%)被归类为A组,27例(48%)被归类为B组。A组与B组的脑钠肽(BNP)中位数分别为514(四分位间距[IQR]:1077)和758(2212)pg/mL,p = 0.14。住院抗菌治疗的中位数持续时间为7(四分位间距[IQR]:6)天和6(IQR:4)天,p = 0.52,而总(住院和出院处方)抗菌治疗的中位数持续时间为11(IQR:6)天和11(IQR:5)天,p = 0.21。将有肺炎证据的患者(A组)与有液体超负荷和心力衰竭的患者(B1组)进行比较。两组的BNP中位数分别为514(IQR:1077)和1040(2094)pg/mL,p = 0.04。A组和B1组经超声心动图证实射血分数<55%的患者分别为4例和14例。此外,A组与B2组的BNP中位数分别为514(IQR:1077)和189(418)pg/mL,p = 0.02。这些发现表明,在充血性心力衰竭(CHF)或被误诊为肺炎的液体潴留患者中,抗菌治疗的不当使用率为48%。与被当作肺炎治疗的液体超负荷和心力衰竭患者相比,肺炎患者观察到的BNP中位数存在显著差异。在被当作肺炎治疗的液体超负荷或CHF患者中,观察到BNP升高和左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的病例比单纯诊断为肺炎的患者更多。有必要对该人群经验性抗菌治疗的影像学证据、实验室数据和关键临床评估进行恰当解读。