College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 22;12(1):1217. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21400-3.
The coupling between nitrification and N gas production to recycle ammonia back to the atmosphere is a key step in the nitrogen cycle that has been researched widely. An assumption for such research is that the products of nitrification (nitrite or nitrate) mix freely in the environment before reduction to N gas. Here we show, in oxic riverbeds, that the pattern of N gas production from ammonia deviates by ~3- to 16-fold from that predicted for denitrification or anammox involving nitrite or nitrate as free porewater intermediates. Rather, the patterns match that for a coupling through a cryptic pool, isolated from the porewater. A cryptic pool challenges our understanding of a key step in the nitrogen cycle and masks our ability to distinguish between sources of N gas that 20 years' research has sought to identify. Our reasoning suggests a new pathway or a new type of coupling between known pathways in the nitrogen cycle.
硝化作用和 N 气体产生之间将氨循环回大气的偶联是氮循环中广泛研究的关键步骤。此类研究的一个假设是,硝化作用的产物(亚硝酸盐或硝酸盐)在还原为 N 气体之前在环境中自由混合。在这里,我们在含氧河床中表明,从氨产生 N 气体的模式与涉及亚硝酸盐或硝酸盐作为自由孔隙水中间体的反硝化作用或厌氧氨氧化作用的预测模式相差约 3 至 16 倍。相反,这些模式与通过与孔隙水隔离的隐匿池的偶联相匹配。隐匿池挑战了我们对氮循环中关键步骤的理解,并掩盖了我们区分 20 年来一直试图确定的 N 气体来源的能力。我们的推理表明了氮循环中已知途径之间的新途径或新的偶联类型。