Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, Angiology, Pulmonology, Medical University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 May 11;10(3):343-355. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa025.
The formation of a thrombus in an epicardial artery may result in an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Despite major advances in acute treatment using network approaches to allocate patients to timely reperfusion and optimal antithrombotic treatment, patients remain at high risk for thrombotic complications. Ongoing activation of the coagulation system as well as thrombin-mediated platelet activation may both play a crucial role in this context. Whether measurement of circulating biomarkers of coagulation and fibrinolysis could be useful for risk stratification in secondary prevention is currently not fully understood. In addition, measurement of such biomarkers could be helpful to identify thrombus formation as the leading mechanism for AMI. The introduction of biomarkers of myocardial injury such as high-sensitivity cardiac troponins made rule-out of AMI even more precise. However, elevated markers of myocardial injury cannot provide proof of a type 1 AMI, let alone thrombus formation. The combined measurement of markers of myocardial injury with biomarkers reflecting ongoing thrombus formation might be helpful for the fast and correct diagnosis of an atherothrombotic type 1 AMI. This position paper gives an overview of the current knowledge and possible role of biomarkers of coagulation and fibrinolysis for the diagnosis of AMI, risk stratification, and individualized treatment strategies in patients with AMI.
心外膜动脉血栓形成可能导致急性心肌梗死(AMI)。尽管通过网络方法将患者及时再灌注和最佳抗血栓治疗的急性治疗取得了重大进展,但患者仍存在血栓并发症的高风险。凝血系统的持续激活以及凝血酶介导的血小板激活可能在此过程中都起着至关重要的作用。目前尚不完全清楚循环凝血和纤溶生物标志物的测量是否可用于二级预防中的风险分层。此外,此类生物标志物的测量可能有助于确定血栓形成是 AMI 的主要机制。心肌损伤标志物如高敏肌钙蛋白的引入使 AMI 的排除更加精确。然而,心肌损伤标志物的升高不能证明是 1 型 AMI,更不用说血栓形成了。同时测量反映持续血栓形成的标志物和心肌损伤标志物可能有助于快速准确地诊断动脉粥样硬化性 1 型 AMI。本立场文件概述了凝血和纤溶生物标志物在 AMI 的诊断、风险分层以及 AMI 患者的个体化治疗策略中的当前知识和可能作用。