Suppr超能文献

课程改革与趋势 2010-2020:运用 AAMC 课程目录和 LCME 年度医学院调查问卷的全国重点调研 第二部分。

Curriculum Changes and Trends 2010-2020: A Focused National Review Using the AAMC Curriculum Inventory and the LCME Annual Medical School Questionnaire Part II.

机构信息

A.D. Blood is director of curricular resources, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.

J.M. Farnan is professor of medicine and associate dean, evaluation and continuous quality improvement, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2020 Sep;95(9S A Snapshot of Medical Student Education in the United States and Canada: Reports From 145 Schools):S5-S14. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003484.

Abstract

Medical school curricula have evolved from 2010 to 2020. Numerous pressures and influences affect medical school curricula, including those from external sources, academic medical institutions, clinical teaching faculty, and undergraduate medical students. Using data from the AAMC Curriculum Inventory and the LCME Annual Medical School Questionnaire Part II, the nature of curriculum change is illuminated. Most medical schools are undertaking curriculum change, both in small cycles of continuous quality improvement and through significant change to curricular structure and content. Four topic areas are explored: cost consciousness, guns and firearms, nutrition, and opioids and addiction medicine. The authors examine how these topic areas are taught and assessed, where in the curriculum they are located, and how much time is dedicated to them in relation to the curriculum as a whole. When examining instructional methods overall, notable findings include (1) the decrease of lecture, although lecture remains the most used instructional method, (2) the increase of collaborative instructional methods, (3) the decrease of laboratory, and (4) the prevalence of clinical instructional methods in academic levels 3 and 4. Regarding assessment methods overall, notable findings include (1) the recent change of the USMLE Step 1 examination to a pass/fail reporting system, (2) a modest increase in narrative assessment, (3) the decline of practical labs, and (4) the predominance of institutionally developed written/computer-based examinations and participation. Among instructional and assessment methods, the most used methods tend to cluster by academic level. It is critical that faculty development evolves alongside curricula. Continued diversity in the use of instructional and assessment methods is necessary to adequately prepare tomorrow's physicians. Future research into the life cycle of a curriculum, as well optional curriculum content, is warranted.

摘要

医学院校课程从 2010 年到 2020 年发生了演变。许多压力和影响因素都会影响医学课程,包括来自外部、学术医疗机构、临床教学教师和本科医学生的影响。本研究利用 AAMC 课程清单和 LCME 年度医学课程问卷第二部分的数据,揭示了课程变革的本质。大多数医学院都在进行课程变革,包括小范围的持续质量改进,以及课程结构和内容的重大变革。本研究探讨了四个主题领域:成本意识、枪支和火器、营养以及阿片类药物和成瘾医学。作者研究了这些主题领域是如何教授和评估的,它们在课程中的位置,以及与整个课程相比,它们占用了多少时间。当考察整体教学方法时,值得注意的发现包括:(1)尽管讲座仍然是最常用的教学方法,但讲座的数量有所减少;(2)合作教学方法的增加;(3)实验室的减少;(4)3 级和 4 级学术水平中临床教学方法的流行。关于整体评估方法,值得注意的发现包括:(1)USMLE 第 1 步考试最近改为通过/失败报告系统;(2)叙述性评估略有增加;(3)实践实验室的减少;(4)机构开发的书面/计算机基础考试和参与占主导地位。在教学和评估方法中,最常用的方法往往按学术水平聚类。教师发展必须与课程同步发展。继续多样化教学和评估方法的使用对于充分培养未来的医生是必要的。未来有必要对课程的生命周期以及可选课程内容进行研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验