Suppr超能文献

评估减少黑色素瘤过度诊断和漏诊干预措施的潜在影响。

Estimating the potential impact of interventions to reduce over-calling and under-calling of melanoma.

作者信息

Gibson M, Scolyer R A, Soyer H P, Ferguson P, McGeechan K, Irwig L, Bell K J L

机构信息

School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Central Sydney Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Jul;35(7):1519-1527. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17189. Epub 2021 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pathologists sometimes disagree over the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma. 'Over-calling' and 'under-calling' of melanoma may harm individuals and healthcare systems.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the extent of 'over-calling' and 'under-calling' of melanoma for a population undergoing one excision per person and to model the impact of potential solutions.

METHODS

In this epidemiological modelling study, we undertook simulations using published data on the prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of melanocytic histopathology in the U.S.

POPULATION

We simulated results for 10 000 patients each undergoing excision of one melanocytic lesion, interpreted by one community pathologist. We repeated the simulation using a hypothetical intervention that improves diagnostic agreement between community pathologist and a specialist dermatopathologist. We then evaluated four scenarios for how melanocytic lesions judged to be neither clearly benign (post-test probability of melanoma < 5%), nor clearly malignant (post-test probability of melanoma > 90%) might be handled, before sending for expert dermatopathologist review to decide the final diagnosis. These were (1) no intervention before expert review, (2) formal second community pathologist review, (3) intervention to increase diagnostic agreement and (4) both the intervention and formal second community pathologist review. The main outcomes were the probability of 'over-calling' and 'under-calling' melanoma, and number of lesions requiring expert referral for each scenario.

RESULTS

For 10 000 individuals undergoing excision of one melanocytic lesion, interpreted by a community pathologist, a hypothetical intervention to improve histopathology agreement reduced the number of benign lesions 'over-called' as melanoma from 308 to 164 and the number of melanomas 'under-called' from 289 to 240. If all uncertain diagnoses were sent for expert review, the number of referrals would decrease from 1500 to 737 cases if formal second community pathologist review was used, and to 701 cases if the hypothetical intervention was additionally used.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to improve histopathology agreement may reduce melanoma 'over-calling' and 'under-calling'.

摘要

背景

病理学家有时在黑色素瘤的组织病理学诊断上存在分歧。黑色素瘤的“过度诊断”和“漏诊”可能会对个人和医疗系统造成损害。

目的

估计每人接受一次切除手术的人群中黑色素瘤“过度诊断”和“漏诊”的程度,并模拟潜在解决方案的影响。

方法

在这项流行病学建模研究中,我们使用美国黑色素细胞组织病理学的患病率和诊断准确性的已发表数据进行模拟。

研究对象

我们模拟了10000名患者的结果,每名患者切除一个黑色素细胞病变,由一名社区病理学家进行解读。我们使用一种假设性干预措施重复模拟,该措施可提高社区病理学家与专科皮肤病理学家之间的诊断一致性。然后,我们评估了四种情况,即如何处理那些被判定既非明显良性(黑色素瘤的检验后概率<5%)也非明显恶性(黑色素瘤的检验后概率>90%)的黑色素细胞病变,然后送专家皮肤病理学家进行最终诊断。这四种情况分别是:(1)在专家审查前不进行干预;(2)由第二位社区病理学家进行正式复查;(3)采取干预措施以提高诊断一致性;(4)既采取干预措施又由第二位社区病理学家进行正式复查。主要结果是黑色素瘤“过度诊断”和“漏诊”的概率,以及每种情况下需要专家转诊的病变数量。

结果

对于10000名接受一个黑色素细胞病变切除手术并由社区病理学家解读的个体,一种假设性的提高组织病理学一致性的干预措施将被“过度诊断”为黑色素瘤的良性病变数量从308例减少到164例,将被“漏诊”的黑色素瘤数量从289例减少到240例。如果所有不确定的诊断都送专家审查,若采用第二位社区病理学家进行正式复查,转诊数量将从1500例减少到737例;若同时采用假设性干预措施,转诊数量将减少到701例。

结论

提高组织病理学一致性的干预措施可能会减少黑色素瘤的“过度诊断”和“漏诊”。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验