• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用新型综合模糊 PIPRECIA-模糊 MABAC 模型评估油菜品种。

Evaluation of rapeseed varieties using novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA - Fuzzy MABAC model.

机构信息

Agricultural Faculty, University of Bijeljina, Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Government of the Brčko District of BiH, Brčko, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0246857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246857. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0246857
PMID:33630837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7906314/
Abstract

Decision making is constantly present in agriculture. Choosing the wrong variety carries the risk that the investment in terms of sowing does not pay off at all. Therefore, it is necessary to choose the variety that gives the best results. In order to achieve this, it is necessary to apply multi-criteria decision-making of available varieties, which is, in this paper, done on the example of hybrid varieties of rapeseed that were created by selection at the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops in Novi Sad. By applying fuzzy logic, a novel integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model is developed and rapeseed varieties were evaluated. For determining four main and 20 subcriteria, fuzzy PIPRECIA (PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment) method has been applied based on fuzzy Bonferroni operator, while for ranking alternatives fuzzy MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison) method has been used. The results obtained using the novel integrated fuzzy MCDM model showed that the variety A2 - Zorica has the best results, followed by A1 - NS Ras, while the worst results were seen by the variety A5 - Zlatna. These results were confirmed using other five fuzzy MCDM methods. Sensitivity analysis-changing criteria weights showed the worst results in the variety A6 - Jovana, which took last place in the application of 18 scenarios. The presented model and the results of this research will help farmers to solve this decision problem.

摘要

决策在农业中无处不在。选择错误的品种可能意味着播种投资根本无法获得回报。因此,有必要选择能带来最佳效果的品种。为了实现这一目标,有必要对可用品种进行多准则决策,本文以在诺维萨德的田间和蔬菜作物研究所通过选择创建的油菜杂交品种为例进行了说明。通过应用模糊逻辑,开发了一种新颖的综合多准则决策(MCDM)模型,并对油菜品种进行了评估。为了确定四个主要标准和 20 个子标准,应用了基于模糊 Bonferroni 算子的模糊 PIPRECIA(PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment)方法,而对于替代方案的排名则应用了模糊 MABAC(Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison)方法。使用新颖的综合模糊 MCDM 模型获得的结果表明,品种 A2-Zorica 的结果最好,其次是 A1-NS Ras,而品种 A5-Zlatna 的结果最差。这一结果通过其他五种模糊 MCDM 方法得到了证实。敏感性分析——改变标准权重的分析表明,品种 A6-Jovana 的结果最差,在 18 种情况下,它的排名最后。所提出的模型和本研究的结果将帮助农民解决这一决策问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/dab1bc738f73/pone.0246857.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/1d0d1e142fe4/pone.0246857.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/33a59b9bf424/pone.0246857.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/05cc18faa806/pone.0246857.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/1119094de437/pone.0246857.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/dab1bc738f73/pone.0246857.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/1d0d1e142fe4/pone.0246857.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/33a59b9bf424/pone.0246857.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/05cc18faa806/pone.0246857.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/1119094de437/pone.0246857.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7906314/dab1bc738f73/pone.0246857.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of rapeseed varieties using novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA - Fuzzy MABAC model.利用新型综合模糊 PIPRECIA-模糊 MABAC 模型评估油菜品种。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0246857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246857. eCollection 2021.
2
An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.一种用于可持续和有弹性的供应商选择的扩展混合模糊多准则决策模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(25):37291-37314. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17851-2. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.一种基于模糊层次分析法和模糊 ARAS 的集成 MCDM 模型,用于在存在模糊性的情况下对柔性制造单元中的输送设备进行评估和选择 。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 12;11(4):e0153222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153222. eCollection 2016.
4
IoT System Selection as a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Problem.作为一个模糊多准则问题的物联网系统选择
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 28;22(11):4110. doi: 10.3390/s22114110.
5
Selection of sustainable construction material from recycled waste plastics by q-rung orthopair fuzzy SWARA-MABAC approach.基于 q-模糊序对犹豫模糊集 SWARA-MABAC 方法的可回收废塑料可持续建筑材料选择。
Chemosphere. 2024 Sep;364:143166. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143166. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
6
Sustainability prioritization of sewage sludge to energy scenarios with hybrid-data consideration: a fuzzy decision-making framework based on full consistency method and fusion ranking model.兼顾混合数据的污水污泥能源方案的可持续性优先级排序:基于完全一致性方法和融合排序模型的模糊决策框架。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5548-5565. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10544-2. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
7
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Hierarchical Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Evaluating Performances of Low-Carbon Tourism Scenic Spots.低碳旅游景区绩效评价的直觉模糊层次多准则决策
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;17(17):6259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176259.
8
Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection.停止模糊 ELECTRE 多准则群决策和最适合生物医学材料选择。
Artif Intell Med. 2022 May;127:102278. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102278. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
9
A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.基于直觉模糊多准则决策的 CODAS 方法用于授权拆解中心选址:以伊斯坦布尔为例。
Waste Manag Res. 2020 Jun;38(6):660-672. doi: 10.1177/0734242X19899729. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
10
Integrated multi-criteria group decision-making methods based on -rung picture fuzzy sets for the identification of occupational hazards.基于梯形模糊集的集成多准则群体决策方法用于职业危害识别
Soft comput. 2023 May 16:1-24. doi: 10.1007/s00500-023-08154-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Selection of an Insurance Company in Agriculture through Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making.基于混合多准则决策的农业保险公司选择
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jun 20;25(6):959. doi: 10.3390/e25060959.
2
Development of a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating the Comprehensive Application of Herbaceous Peony at Low Latitudes.发展一种多准则决策方法,用于评估低纬度地区草本牡丹的综合应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 18;23(22):14342. doi: 10.3390/ijms232214342.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence of health benefits of canola oil.菜籽油对健康有益的证据。
Nutr Rev. 2013 Jun;71(6):370-85. doi: 10.1111/nure.12033. Epub 2013 May 2.