Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Maxillofacial Surgery, Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Maxillofacial Surgery, Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;50(9):1226-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the Frankfort horizontal (FH) and natural head orientation (NHO), their correlation between patients' malocclusion, and the impact of counterclockwise rotation (CCW) on the FH-NHO angle variation after orthognathic surgery. An evaluation of 187 consecutive patients was performed at the Maxillofacial Institute (Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona). FH-NHO° was measured pre- and postoperatively at 1 and 12 months, after three-dimensional (3D) superimposition using a software (Dolphin®). Patients were classified as follows: 3.2%, 48.7% and 48.1%, class I, II and III, respectively. Baseline FH-NHO° was significantly positive for patients with dentofacial deformities (2.73°±4.19 (2.12-3.33°, P<0.001). The impact of orthognathic surgery in FH-NHO° was greater in class II when compared with class III patients, with a variation of 2.04°±4.79 (P<0.001) and -1.20°±3.03 (P<0.001), respectively. FH-NHO° increased when CCW rotational movements were performed (P=0.006). The results of this study suggest that pre- and postoperative NHO differs from FH in orthognathic patients. The angle between FH and NHO is significantly larger in class III than in class II patients at baseline, which converges after orthognathic surgery when CCW rotation is performed. Therefore, NHO should be used as the real horizontal plane when planning for orthognathic surgery.
本研究旨在评估法兰克福水平(FH)与自然头位(NHO)之间的关系、它们在患者错颌畸形中的相关性,以及逆时针旋转(CCW)对面颌骨畸形术后 FH-NHO 角度变化的影响。在马克西莫夫面部研究所(巴塞罗那 Teknon 医疗中心)对 187 例连续患者进行了评估。使用软件(Dolphin®)进行三维(3D)叠加后,分别在术前和术后 1 个月和 12 个月测量 FH-NHO°。患者分类如下:分别为 3.2%、48.7%和 48.1%,I 类、II 类和 III 类。牙颌面畸形患者的基线 FH-NHO°明显为正(2.73°±4.19°[2.12-3.33°],P<0.001)。与 III 类患者相比,II 类患者的正颌手术对 FH-NHO°的影响更大,差异为 2.04°±4.79°(P<0.001)和-1.20°±3.03°(P<0.001)。当进行 CCW 旋转运动时,FH-NHO°增加(P=0.006)。本研究结果表明,正颌患者的术前和术后 NHO 与 FH 不同。在基线时,III 类患者的 FH 和 NHO 之间的角度明显大于 II 类患者,当进行 CCW 旋转时,正颌手术后该角度会收敛。因此,在规划正颌手术时,应将 NHO 用作真实的水平平面。