Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Neuromusculoskeletal lab, Brussels, Belgium.
Clinique Universitaire Saint-Luc,Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Departement, Bruxelles, Belgium.
J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Dec;29(6):341-352. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2021.1889165. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
: In a pragmatic and randomized clinical trial, patients with lateral ankle sprains were assessed, under blinded conditions, for their responsiveness and improvements during Mulligan mobilization-with-movement (MWM) therapy. : Overall, 51 participants with subacute lateral ankle sprains (Grade I-II) were recruited. Following an MWM screening procedure, responders were randomized to either an intervention group (MWM) or a sham group. The MWM group received inferior tibiofibular, talocrural, or cubometatarsal MWM. The treatment or sham was administered upon three sessions, each 4 days apart. Changes from baseline were measured and compared between the sessions for dorsiflexion range of motion, pain, stiffness perception, and the Y-balance test. : In total, 43 participants were considered responders to MWM. Using a two-way repeated-measure ANOVA, a statistical and clinically meaningful improvement in dorsiflexion range of motion was revealed in the MWM group (p = 0.004, 1 = +1.762 cm; 3 = +2.714 cm), whereas no improvement following the first session occurred in the sham group (p = 0.454, 1trial = +1.091 cm; 3trial = +1.409 cm). Pain and stiffness significantly improved, yet below the clinically meaningful level. The MWM group demonstrated a significant improvement after three sessions for the Y-balance test (p = 0.001, +8.857 cm). : More than 80% of participants with subacute lateral ankle sprains responded well to the MWM approach. Three sessions of pragmatically determined MWM provided a significant and clinically meaningful benefit in dorsiflexion range of motion and Y-balance test performance compared to a sham treatment.
: 在一项实用且随机的临床试验中,对患有外踝扭伤的患者进行了评估,在盲法条件下评估他们在麦吉尔动觉松动术(MWM)治疗过程中的反应性和改善情况。:总体上,招募了 51 名患有亚急性外踝扭伤(I 级-II 级)的参与者。在进行 MWM 筛选程序后,反应者被随机分配到干预组(MWM)或假手术组。MWM 组接受下胫腓骨、距下关节或跗跖骨 MWM。治疗或假治疗每 4 天进行一次,共 3 次。在治疗前后测量并比较背屈活动范围、疼痛、僵硬感和 Y 平衡测试的变化。:共有 43 名参与者被认为对 MWM 有反应。使用双向重复测量 ANOVA,MWM 组的背屈活动范围显示出统计学和临床有意义的改善(p = 0.004,1 试验 = +1.762cm;3 试验 = +2.714cm),而假手术组在第一次治疗后没有改善(p = 0.454,1 试验 = +1.091cm;3 试验 = +1.409cm)。疼痛和僵硬感显著改善,但仍低于临床有意义的水平。MWM 组在 3 次治疗后 Y 平衡测试显著改善(p = 0.001,+8.857cm)。:超过 80%的亚急性外踝扭伤患者对 MWM 方法反应良好。与假治疗相比,3 次实用确定的 MWM 治疗可显著改善背屈活动范围和 Y 平衡测试表现,具有临床意义。