Aortic Root Enlargement in patients with small aortic annulus undergoing double valve replacement. Is it justified? A retrospective Comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND

Small Aortic Annulus (AA) is big issue during Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) necessitating replacement of an undersized prosthetic valve especially with Double Valve Replacement (DVR). Despite that small aortic valve prostheses can lead to Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch (PPM), there remains reluctance to perform aortic root enlargement (ARE) procedures fearing from morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with small aortic annulus undergoing double valve replacement.

METHODS

The study included 100 consecutive patients underwent DVR for combined rheumatic aortic and mitral valve diseases, between Jan. 2016 and Sept. 2020. Only (50) patients had ARE with DVR.  ARE was performed using an autologous or bovine pericardium or Dacron patch by Nick¢s or Manouguian procedures. The estimated postoperative end-points were mortality, effective orifice areas (EOA), mean aortic pressure gradient and valve-related complications. The least postoperative follow-up period was 6 months.

RESULTS

The study included 30 male and 70 female patients with mean age of 35±20 years, body surface area (BSA) of 1.5 ±0.20 m2, aortic annulus diameter was 20±1.4 mm, aortic orifice area was 0.80±0.50 cm2, and aortic peak gradient (PG) 80±40 mm Hg. During follow-up period, there was a mild to moderate paravalvular leak (1%) with, (1%) heart block, and residual PG on prosthetic aortic valve; that was all in DVR alone.

CONCLUSION

Enlargement of aortic root by Nick¢s or Manouguian technique is safe and effective in patients with small aortic annulus undergoing double valve replacements.