Medizinische Klinik III, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Sep;110(9):1353-1368. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01821-2. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
Multiple new recommendations have been introduced in the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes with a focus on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Most recommendations are supported by high-quality scientific evidence. The guidelines provide solutions to overcome obstacles presumed to complicate a convenient interpretation of troponin results such as age-, or sex-specific cutoffs, and to give practical advice to overcome delays of laboratory reporting. However, in some areas, scientific support is less well documented or even missing, and other areas are covered rather by expert opinion or subjective recommendations. We aim to provide a critical appraisal on several recommendations, mainly related to the diagnostic and prognostic assessment, highlighting the discrepancies between Guideline recommendations and the existing scientific evidence.
2020 年 ESC 急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南引入了多项新建议,重点关注无持续 ST 段抬高的患者的诊断、预后和管理。大多数建议都有高质量的科学证据支持。该指南提供了解决方案,以克服可能使肌钙蛋白检测结果解读复杂化的障碍,如年龄或性别特异性截断值,并提供了实用建议,以克服实验室报告延迟的问题。然而,在某些领域,科学证据的记录较少,甚至缺失,而其他领域则主要由专家意见或主观建议涵盖。我们旨在对几个建议进行批判性评估,主要涉及诊断和预后评估,突出指南建议与现有科学证据之间的差异。