Colon Paula Jenkins, Greene Dina N
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
J Appl Lab Med. 2018 May 1;2(6):941-951. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2017.024257.
Shifts in consumer behavior and clinical practice have increased reports of biotin interference in immunoassays that incorporate biotin-streptavidin linkages in their design. This rise has significant implications because immunoassays are used to measure a wide range of analytes across medical specialties. The objective of this article was to review the mechanisms of biotin interference, define the scope of affected immunoassays, and summarize strategies for identifying and minimizing biotin interference in clinical samples.
The literature was reviewed for reports of biotin interference and sorted by manufacturer. Abstracts from recent scientific meetings and manufacturer-provided data were also reviewed.
Immunoassays across a range of different manufacturer platforms are subject to interference by exogenous biotin supplementation. Providers and laboratorians must be aware of this potential interference to avoid patient harm.
消费者行为和临床实践的转变增加了生物素干扰免疫测定报告的数量,这些免疫测定在设计中采用了生物素-链霉亲和素连接。这种增加具有重大意义,因为免疫测定用于测量医学各专业的多种分析物。本文的目的是回顾生物素干扰的机制,界定受影响免疫测定的范围,并总结识别和最小化临床样本中生物素干扰的策略。
对有关生物素干扰报告的文献进行了回顾,并按制造商分类。还查阅了近期科学会议的摘要和制造商提供的数据。
一系列不同制造商平台的免疫测定都易受外源性生物素补充的干扰。医疗服务提供者和实验室工作人员必须意识到这种潜在干扰,以避免对患者造成伤害。