Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021 Jan-Feb;116(1):7-15. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.116.1.7.
Robotic bariatric surgery (RBS) has increased in recent years. Many doubts continue to exist regarding its utility in terms of postoperative complications, costs and technical aspects. RBS has increased its number and shows a more technical challenge associated with more post-operative complications compared to primary bariatric surgery. We herein present a single institution experience and review to describe its utility in revisional surgery. A retrospective review of our experience and a review of the literature has been conducted to evaluate the impact of robotic revisional surgery in the bariatric field. A total of 17 patients (5 female and 12 male) were operated on. Most frequent surgery was conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to gastric bypass (n=9). No leaks were found nor severe complications. A systematic review showed similar results including a decreased number for complications when performing robotic revisional surgery. Revisional robotic surgery shows better results compared to standard laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery in terms of efficacy, safety and hospital stay. No differences were seen in rates of mortality, morbidity and reintervention between both approaches. We encourage surgeons to learn to perform the robotic technique as part of the process of democratization and standardization of bariatric surgery.
机器人减重手术(RBS)近年来有所增加。关于其在术后并发症、成本和技术方面的实用性仍存在许多疑问。与原发性减重手术相比,RBS 的数量增加了,并且与更多的术后并发症相关,具有更大的技术挑战。在此,我们介绍一家机构的经验并进行文献复习,以描述其在减重手术中的应用。对我们的经验进行回顾性分析,并对文献进行复习,以评估机器人减重手术在减重领域的影响。共对 17 名患者(5 名女性和 12 名男性)进行了手术。最常见的手术是袖状胃切除术转为胃旁路术(n=9)。未发现漏诊或严重并发症。系统评价显示了类似的结果,包括机器人减重手术的并发症数量减少。与标准腹腔镜减重手术相比,机器人减重手术在疗效、安全性和住院时间方面具有更好的结果。两种方法在死亡率、发病率和再干预率方面没有差异。我们鼓励外科医生学习机器人技术,将其作为减重手术普及和标准化的一部分。