• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大体评估供体器官获取后低温保存液的质量:一项基于英国人群的队列研究。

Macroscopic assessment of the quality of cold perfusion after deceased-donor kidney procurement: A United Kingdom population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2021 May;35(5):e14272. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14272. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.14272
PMID:33638883
Abstract

Concern regarding the quality of cold perfusion (QOP) during macroscopic assessment of procured kidneys is a common reason for discard. In the UK, QOP is routinely graded by both retrieving and implanting teams during back-bench surgery as: 1 (good), 2 (fair), 3 (poor) or 4 (patchy). We evaluated the association of this grading with organ utilization, graft outcomes, and agreement between teams. Data on all deceased-donor kidneys procured between January 2000 and December 2016 were analyzed for discard rates, while association with graft outcomes was studied in single adult transplants. Of 31,167 kidneys procured, 90.6%, 5.7%, 1.7%, and 2.1% were assigned grades 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, at retrieval. QOP was an independent risk factor of discard, with the highest rates observed in grade 3 kidneys (41.8%), compared to 6.5% in grade 1 (aOR 7.67, 95% CI 5.44-10.82, p < .001). Grading at retrieval was an independent predictor of delayed graft function (p = .019) and primary non-function (p = .001), but not long-term graft survival (p = .111). Implanting grade was an independent predictor of all three outcomes (p < .001, p < .001, and p = .002, respectively). Consistency of grading between teams was poor (Kappa = 0.179). QOP influences utilization and predicts outcomes, but a standardized and validated scoring system is required.

摘要

人们普遍担心获取的肾脏在宏观评估过程中的冷保存质量(QOP),这也是导致肾脏被丢弃的常见原因。在英国,QOP 通常由取肾和植肾团队在后台手术中进行分级:1(良好)、2(一般)、3(差)或 4(不均匀)。我们评估了这种分级与器官利用率、移植物结局以及团队之间的一致性之间的关系。对 2000 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间获取的所有已故供体肾脏的数据进行了分析,以评估丢弃率,同时在单器官成人移植中研究了与移植物结局的关系。在获取的 31167 个肾脏中,分别有 90.6%、5.7%、1.7%和 2.1%的肾脏在获取时被分级为 1、2、3 和 4。QOP 是丢弃的独立危险因素,在 3 级肾脏中观察到的丢弃率最高(41.8%),而在 1 级肾脏中仅为 6.5%(优势比 7.67,95%置信区间 5.44-10.82,p<.001)。获取时的分级是延迟移植物功能(p=.019)和原发性无功能(p=.001)的独立预测因素,但不是长期移植物存活率的独立预测因素(p=.111)。植肾时的分级是所有三个结局的独立预测因素(p<.001、p<.001 和 p=.002,分别)。团队之间分级的一致性较差(Kappa=.179)。QOP 影响利用率并预测结局,但需要一个标准化和验证的评分系统。

相似文献

1
Macroscopic assessment of the quality of cold perfusion after deceased-donor kidney procurement: A United Kingdom population-based cohort study.大体评估供体器官获取后低温保存液的质量:一项基于英国人群的队列研究。
Clin Transplant. 2021 May;35(5):e14272. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14272. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
2
Association of Deceased Donor Acute Kidney Injury With Recipient Graft Survival.死亡供体急性肾损伤与受者移植物存活的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918634. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18634.
3
Systematic Surgical Assessment of Deceased-Donor Kidneys as a Predictor of Short-Term Transplant Outcomes.对已故供体肾脏进行系统手术评估作为短期移植结果的预测指标
Eur Surg Res. 2019;60(3-4):97-105. doi: 10.1159/000501602. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
4
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of methods of storing donated kidneys from deceased donors: a systematic review and economic model.deceased donors: a systematic review and economic model. 存储已故捐赠者所捐肾脏方法的有效性和成本效益:一项系统综述与经济模型
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Aug;13(38):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-156. doi: 10.3310/hta13380.
5
Early Outcomes of the New UK Deceased Donor Kidney Fast-Track Offering Scheme.英国新的已故捐赠者肾脏快速分配计划的早期结果
Transplantation. 2017 Dec;101(12):2888-2897. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001860.
6
Kidney utilization in the Netherlands - do we optimally use our donor organs?荷兰的肾脏利用情况 - 我们是否最优利用了我们的供体器官?
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Feb 28;38(3):787-796. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac300.
7
The discard of deceased donor kidneys in the UK.英国已故捐赠者肾脏的废弃情况。
Clin Transplant. 2014 Mar;28(3):345-53. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12319. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
8
Dual kidney transplants from adult marginal donors successfully expand the limited deceased donor organ pool.来自成年边缘供体的双肾移植成功扩大了有限的 deceased 供体器官库。 (注:这里“deceased donor”直译为“已故供体”,在医学领域常表述为“脑死亡供体”等更符合语境的说法,但按要求未作修改。)
Clin Transplant. 2016 Apr;30(4):380-92. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12697. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
9
The weekend effect alters the procurement and discard rates of deceased donor kidneys in the United States.周末效应改变了美国已故捐赠者肾脏的获取和丢弃率。
Kidney Int. 2016 Jul;90(1):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 May 12.
10
Effect of donor age and cold storage time on outcome in recipients of kidneys donated after circulatory death in the UK: a cohort study.英国循环死亡后捐献肾脏受者中供者年龄和冷藏时间对结局的影响:一项队列研究。
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):727-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61685-7. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning for automated boundary detection and segmentation in organ donation photography.用于器官捐献摄影中自动边界检测和分割的深度学习
Innov Surg Sci. 2024 Aug 20. doi: 10.1515/iss-2024-0022.